Western Defence

Zoo Nation?

2008-08-23T12:45:00.002Z

The Chinese seem to have provided an excellent Olympics, not that I'm really into it, but in the past fortnight, it has been difficult to avoid it. The opening ceremony was a celebration of Chinese culture and history, of course it was cliched and sickly sweet, but for the Chinese it was a moment of pride in their collective achievement.

What is planned for London 2012?

Well, apparently we are to be represented by a troupe of 'dancers' called Zoo Nation, an urban hip hop, rap group!

I know, I know, usually I would be swearing, and I was when I found out, but really is it a surprise? Not really, everything else is polluted with this 'diversity' shit, so why not the Olympics? In fact the bid for the Olympics was full of references to bullshit 'diversity', they had dozens of black and Asian kids in Singapore representing London!

But what an embarrassment, what a humiliation, every nation is allowed to celebrate their culture and history, except us! What a pathetic joke

Guardian article

BNP article

Another Guardian article

Free Republic article

Baiting the Bear

2008-08-16T09:26:00.002Z

'Mikheil Saakashvili’s decision to use the opening of the Olympic Games to cover Georgia’s invasion of its breakaway province of South Ossetia must rank in stupidity with Gamal Abdel-Nasser’s decision to close the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships.

Nasser’s blunder cost him the Sinai in the Six-Day War. Saakashvili’s blunder probably means permanent loss of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

After shelling and attacking what he claims is his own country, killing scores of his own Ossetian citizens and sending tens of thousands fleeing into Russia, Saakashvili’s army was whipped back into Georgia in 48 hours.

Vladimir Putin took the opportunity to kick the Georgian army out of Abkhazia, as well, to bomb Tbilisi and to seize Gori, birthplace of Stalin.

Reveling in his status as an intimate of George Bush, Dick Cheney and John McCain, and America’s lone democratic ally in the Caucasus, Saakashvili thought he could get away with a lightning coup and present the world with a fait accompli.

Mikheil did not reckon on the rage or resolve of the Bear.'

Read the rest here

Russia and the 'Free World'

2008-08-15T21:46:00.003Z

George Bush has declared that Russia's actions in Georgia has damaged it's relations with the 'Free World', hmmmmm!

The same Free World where it's governments unleash millions of third world savages on their own people?

The same Free World where the indigenous peoples are banned from objecting to this third world invasion, sponsored by it's governments, and threatened with persecution and imprisonment if they do oppose it?

The same Free World where half of our incomes are stolen by those very same states, much of it to pay for the health, lodgings, employment (or more often unemployment) and education of the same third world invaders?

The same Free World where we are told we have the power to 'change things', when in fact all we have is different versions of the same political prostitutes who are selling their peoples down the river?

Well, if that is the Free World, I want nothing to do with it, Although Russia is not perfect, at least their leaders don't sell their people down the river for a quick buck, at least they don't steal half their incomes to pay for a third world invasion of African and Islamic savages, which they then unleash against their people!

We are being lied to, we are being whored out for the benefit of these political pimps, the same ones who now condemn Russia for protecting their own people, I know who I would rather have rule me!

Russophobia and Gerorgia

2008-08-10T20:41:00.003Z

So, when the Serbs try to reassert their authority over land that is theirs, in fact the historic heart of their nation and chase out the invaders, that is evil and NATO must then bomb the shit out of the Serbs to prevent them to recapture their land!

When Georgia does the very same in Ossetia and the Russians take the place of NATO, then it is Russia that is the bad guy?

So George Bush condemns Russia for 'violating' the territorial sovereignty of Georgia, right! What happened in Iraq in 2003?

What happened in Vietnam in the sixties and seventies?

Did Vietnam or Iraq kill American troops in Kuwait or the Gulf of Tonkin?

Russia borders Georgia, the Ossetians wants nothing to do with Georgia and would prefer to be absorbed by Russia, the Georgians under the insane Saakashvilli attacked Ossetia and Russia responded.

Russia did not 'invade' Georgia as many western papers stated, the retaliated against a cocky Georgia.

Perhaps Saakashvilli thought the Americans would ride to his aid? Perhaps he thought the Russians would stand by and let him humiliate them, he was wrong!

Russia is in the right, perhaps they will use this to crush Georgia and overthrow Saakashvilli, well he can't say it's not partly his fault, can he?

With the Ukraine now making unhelpful statements regarding the Russian naval bases in the Crimea, it seems this may turn into something more dangerous, I hope the Ukrainians are only sabre rattling, because they would not be best serve with a war with Russia.

I am amazed at the naked hatred of Russia I have seen in 'conservative' blogs over the past two days, it seems one rule for us, another for Russia, apparently Russia must swallow all defeats and humiliations without comeback, whilst we, in the west must right every wrong and 'free' all peoples, even against their will! This is arrogance of the highest kind, it is Russia to which we should be looking for hope and protection, it is Russia that has successfully fought and beat Muslims in the recent past, not us, it is Russia that has some of the worlds largest energy reserves, not us, it is Russia that is seeing a Christian renaissance and a rediscovery of it's past, not us!

America seems weak now, it is divided and bankrupt, it's armies are broken and overstretched, it has lost its way in the 'war on terror' and like the rest of the west is being swamped by invading immigrants, Russia is strong, it is Russia we need to look to now, antagonising them now would be a folly of historic proportions.

An idiotic war!

2008-08-08T18:51:00.002Z

What the hell is wrong with President Mikheil Saakashvili of Georgia?

Does he think we are going to aid him in his moronic bid for a victory against Russia?

This is insane!

I want nothing to do with a war over 'South Ossetia', I don't care if Georgia owns it or Russia owns it or if it is independent, it is no business of ours! Mr Saakashvilli's attempt to get us involved should be given short shrift, he must be told we will not risk nuclear war over this shitty scrap of Caucasian land. He must also be told in no uncertain terms that he should cease his stupid war and that he must leave power at once.

We must not allow this to go further then Georgia, it is not our fight, we must make that plain now!

Telegraph

The Times

Reuters

Capital Punishment, the one thing the government hates!

2008-08-06T17:30:00.004Z

Now we all know how limp wristed the government are, we all know who sleazy and amoral they are, and now we all know as fact, that they love criminals, especially murderers!

You probably all know by now about the honeymooners who were burgled and shot in Antigua, resulting in their deaths. Well, apparently the British government (ie: traitors) have demanded that no one be executed in relation to this DOUBLE murder!

'The British government faces a potential diplomatic row with Antigua over the shooting of the honeymoon couple Catherine and Benjamin Mullany after demanding that anyone convicted of the crime will not face the death penalty.'

What is wrong with these morons?

Why are they so obsessed with some murdering scum who murdered two Britons, once known as their fellow countrymen. I know they made a song and dance about Saddam Hussein's execution, but now it seems that it is government policy, why?

These idiots who rule this country just piss me off so much, why shouldn't some murdering scum get hanged? The majority of people in this country want murderers to be executed, and these arse holes pontificate on our behalf on a subject that they are miles away from us on!

What pompous pricks!

Link

The Saxon Code

2008-07-27T14:01:00.001Z

No crown but ours shall govern here,
No strangers rule with gold or fear,
No plow but ours may slough the loam,
No prow but ours slash the spume,
No hand but ours may bind our kin,
No gods but ours proclaim a sin,
No law but ours may stay a blow,
No hand but ours may draw a bow,
No men but ours may hunt the land,
No sons but ours bear sword in hand,
No word but ours shall we trust,
No flags be flown except of us,
No land but ours do we demand,
No more than what we have farmed,
No strangers slaving on our soil,
No man unpaid or forced to toil,
No heroes praised but ours alone,
No other kin but our blood and bone,
No strangers to tell us who we are,
No obedience to any foreign laws.

Source

A sad day!

2008-07-23T12:26:00.003Z

Well, Radovan Karadzic has finally been caught!

The left are having fits of euphoria, running all the old anti-Serb propaganda, talking of the innocent Muslims, and the nasty Serbs!

They have already condemned Mr Karadzic, even though they insist he will face a trial! Why? The result is already known, they will find him guilty! He opposed elite liberal opinion, he stood by his own people, he waged a war for the survival of the Serbs in Bosnia, and for this, he will be found guilty.

The left don't care if you kill people or have responsibility for thousands or millions of deaths, the only care why you killed them! If, you killed them to return your country to a year zero, or if you killed people to redistribute property or just killed those who opposed you, they don't care, as long as you are a lefty, as long as you have signed up to all the trendy modern causes, they will give you a pass!

If, on the other hand, you fight for your ethnic group, against another ethnic group who also are of a different religion, and you do it for ethnic, national and religious reasons, then any deaths resulting are evil! Look at the difference in treatment between the rulers of China, Vietnam and South Africa on the one side and the Christian Lebanese, Bosnian Serbs, Russians and Kosovan Serbs on the other!

There seems to be a pattern, if you are white, and you fight against blacks then the whites are evil, Rhodesia, Apartheid South Africa and Darfur are examples of this, if you are 'ethnic', but you are Christian and are fighting the Muslims, (Same colour) then it's the Christians you are baddies, the Maronite Christians and Armenians are in this category.

If both are white but one side is Muslim, then they become the default 'goodies' in the MSM and among western governments, who, never missing an opportunity to fuck their own up the arse in favour of Muslims, will align themselves to our enemies!

The MSM reaction to the capture of Mr Karadzic is perverse, as was the treatment of the Serbs in the Yugoslavian wars of the 1990s. We were told day after day, week after week that the Serbs had started the wars, that they were purposefully continuing the wars and were the only ones killing 'innocents'.

And most of us believed it!

Well it is now known that Chechens, Afghans, Iranians and other Muslims were in Bosnia fighting the Serbs, that they would viciously murder the Serbs they captured, video it and use it in pro-Islamic propaganda. Hizbollah, Al Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood were in Bosnia, funded not only by their own people, but by Western governments, especially the British and American governments!

Now, I'm sure most of us are quite used to knowing our governments are at best whores, and at worst traitors, but surely this is unbelievable? That the British and American governments were sending money to Iran so that they could fund Hizbollah who were murdering Christian Serbs in Bosnia!

So in effect we were funding Hisbollah! Through our taxes!

But of course, it's always the cartoon baddies that the MSM goes after, never after the traitors in our governments (well, they wouldn't, would they)

And what is ironic, is that we may have to look for many Mr Karadzics in the West to ethnically cleanse us of all the hordes of minorities who reside here and are still coming in!

Who will look the fool then?

Now the fat are 'victims'!!!

2008-07-16T10:21:00.003Z

When will this non-sense stop?

Well, some lard buts have decided to follow on the coat tails of the rest of the 'diversity' gravy train and demand similar hate laws that would prevent 'discrimination' against fatties in the workplace, on airplanes or out and about. Apparently a new cartoon about lazy fatties has them enraged!

'WALL-E has garnered rave reviews for its satire on consumer culture, in which future humans are depicted as a group of obese gluttons who never leave their padded floating arm chairs.

But one group is not amused - the swelling ranks of fat pride groups, who believe the film propagates anti-obesity hysteria comparable with the quest for the perfect body by the eugenics movement in Nazi Germany. '

Fat Pride? Who would be proud to be fat? And see how they are trying to compare themselves to the Jews? See how us making fun of fatties is suddenly as bad as the Holocaust?

'Fighters for fat rights are calling for legislation to ban weight discrimination in the workplace, denouncing airlines that demand they buy two seats and car manufacturers whose seat belts are too small. '

So, Instead of these fat lard arses paying for 2 seats, I have got to be crushed by their flab if I'm unlucky enough to get seated next to them? Fuck them, all they have to do is stop eating so much shit! Then they have the cheek to demand legislation to prevent doctors demanding that they lose some weight before and operation! Are these people stupid as well?

A large human blob, Ms Wann, the head of the Fat Pride group, condemns the cartoon saying, "It's the classic stereotype that fat people are stupid, smelly, lazy, disgusting and out of control.'

Uhhh, yeah, well fat people ARE stupid, smelly, lazy, disgusting and obviously out of control! That's how they got fat in the first place!!!

I have had the opportunity to be near some fatties in my time, most were smelly due to the folds of fat that they can't wash properly, they are obviously not very active, or they would not be fat, it does seem disgusting to allow one's self to get that big and that gross by eating pretty much non stop for years!

Fatties don't get fat in a fortnight, it takes years of effort, well, years of idleness. Surely it is to be expected?

So, The fatties can go on all they like about 'discrimination', hate speech etc, it does not change the fact that they are lazy, stupid, disgusting and out of control!

All they have to do to lose some weight is eat less shit, eat less overall and walk now and then!

Source

Film: WALL-E

Insanity!

2008-07-15T13:32:00.005Z

I was made aware of this piece by a friend. Apparently during 'Gay Pride in London, some 'trans people', whatever that means, 'transsexual' or 'transvestite' it does not make completely clear, were offended by a toilet steward.

The story states that some big hairy men in frocks tried to enter the women's toilet at Trafalgar Square, only to be stopped by the sensible steward who rightly decided that a big hairy man in a frock did not a woman make! So he refused entry to the toilets and suggested that they could use the disabled toilets, obviously trying to be helpful, and not wanting to have women screaming at the sight of some big hairy man!

However, this was not enough for the big hairy men in frocks, they demanded to be allowed in, and they wanted and apology for the discrimination shown to them!!!

Well as you can imagine, the big hairy men in frocks got their way, supported by the police!

Tell me this is not a society in terminal decline! When men can pretend to be women and then accuse someone of discrimination when not allowed into a woman's toilet, then you must admit something is very wrong with us!

I can only despair!

Source

Resumption of service!

2008-07-14T22:15:00.003Z

Ah well, that took longer then I thought!

It's been an interesting few months, the economy is going into meltdown, our glorious leaders, those imbeciles, are thrashing around feigning that they actually know anything about economics, whilst fucking people up the arse with more taxes, more fines, and debasing the currency in a reckless stupid and shortsighted fashion.

Then Gordon Brown, goes back on Labour's manifesto pledge to hold a referendum on the European Constitution, that lying spiv Brown and that shower of mediocre, treasonous shits that make up the cabinet make up some ridiculous non-sense that the Lisbon Treaty is different from the Constitution. What a crock of shit!

America seems likely to be electing Barrack Obama, some lefty half caste with an axe to grind, someone who's loyalty to the US seems at best, suspect, and whats worse, most of White America seems fine with it!!

Ron Paul was a non-event in the Republican primaries, proving that Americans seem as dedicated to their own destruction as are Europeans, what a sad state of affairs!

A storm is coming, it is the judgement awaiting us for our own craven surrender in the face of aggressive third worlders, for our selling of our birthrights, for our embrace of a destructive nihilism where there is no right, no standard, no morality and no loyalty!

This storm will be lit by the coming economic cataclysm, it will be stoked by the racial and sectarian divides that are the results of the massive and reckless immigration policies, and kept going by our complete detachment from reality!

It is, I believe, a storm we deserve and need!

Fare well!

2008-01-22T19:27:00.000Z

As anyone who has been viewing this site recently has noticed, I have been off doing other things. I now think this is the right time to stop blogging.

It has been fun, I have learnt many things, conversed with many intelligent people, but now, I'm changing careers and countries and selling my house, so for the next few months I will be busy, after that who knows.

God Bless!

The Aurora Borealis

2007-11-28T15:57:00.000Z

A good man died today!

2007-11-20T23:19:00.000Z

Ian Smith was for 15 years the Prime Minister of Rhodesia, a great African nation that has now been reduced to ruin by a black communist terrorist Robert Mugabe, with the full moral support of the West and it's corrupt leaders.

Ian Smith was a true gentleman, he did not, as his detractors insist, hate black people, he only thought them unable for self rule, and who can now dispute that?

He declared independence from a white hating socialist government, with a declaration much the same as that issued by the Americans two centuries previously, instead of being welcomed into the supposed civilised world, he was smeared and hated, the Americans, the British in league with the Soviets worked hard to bring down this legitimate government, the Soviets, with the full knowledge of the west funded and trained terrorists to murder white farmers and their black farm hands.

Rhodesia was once a wealthy, civilised nation, a proud nation of a few million blacks and three hundred thousand white settlers, the black Rhodesians had at that time one of the highest standards of living in Africa, now they are living in a squalid prison nation, starving to death. But at least they are 'democratic' those white people who destroyed Rhodesia will no doubt say!

Shame on Harold Wilson, shame on Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford and Edward Heath, shame on all of those who sold the people of Rhodesia down the river for mistaken ideology, the lie of 'democracy'.

Long may the memory of Ian Smith live on, may he rest in peace.

Wikipedia's Ian Smith article

Enoch Powell's 'River of Blood' speach

2007-11-08T23:47:00.000Z

Note how moderate it really is, and remember how this man was smeared by the establishment who were in fear after he spoke the truth. He was smeared and destroyed, has anyone learned? Apparently not as Nigel Hasitlow has discovered! Much to Cameron's continued shame!

"The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.

After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.

I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.

There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.

Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendant should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.

Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.

“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.

But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.

Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."

That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal."

Why America must vote for Ron Paul!

2007-10-31T13:46:00.000Z

Americans have only one real choice for president in 2008 and he is Ron Paul! He is the only candidate who will limit government, he is the only candidate who will lower taxes, he is the only man who will attempt to reign in America's reckless spending, borrowing and printing of money.

Most importantly, he is the only candidate who could spark a restoration of the West.

Ron Paul is something unusual for an elected representative, he is honest, decent, honourable, wise, moral and straightforward!

He is a Christian, who is repelled by abortion, he opposes the heavy handedness of government, its theft of people's money (tax) and is committed to the abolition of the IRS, Income Tax, the CIA, FBI, NSA, Dept of Labour, Education, Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve, Dept of Health, etc...

He is committed to getting rid of America's deficit, restoring sound money and pulling all American troops out of ALL foreign fields, not just Iraq and Afghanistan!

Social Welfare and Medicare would be put on a transition to abolision.

He opposes any amnesty of illegal immigrants and will act to build a fence on the Mexican border, he would withdraw from the UN, OAS, NAFTA, WTO, World Bank, NATO and a myriad of other useless international organisations.

This truly is radically different to any other candidate and must be a truer representation of many conservative's views.

Some of these things are stuff I can only dream about, and you Americans have the chance to support him and deliver yourselves from Big Government and socialism for good!

The reason I want Paul to win, is that the example displayed to the rest of the world would inspire so many to ask, "well if the Yanks are getting rid of their Income tax, then why can't we"?

People will ask, "well the Yanks left the UN, what is it actually for"?

If Those United States abolish whole departments of state, then they may ask, "do we actually need these twenty or thirty departments"?

And if a President Paul stops illegal immigration into those United States, people over here may ask, "well if America can stop illegal immigration with a thousand mile border fence and good policing, why can't we do it when we are an island"?

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are lost, they were a long time ago by weak willed and lily livered politicians who can only do something once they have the latest polling results before them. there is no point supporting Guilliani or McCain because they support the war, Guilliani is not exactly someone who supports liberty and McCain is all for illegal immigration and amnesty. Why any conservative would vote for Romney with his doubling of public spending whilst governor of Massachusetts or his legalising of gay marriage is beyond me, he is no conservative.

Paul is the only true conservative, he could inspire us all, he could be exactly what our elites fear and would hate, an honest man of integrity who can't be smeared by this hateful clique.

All this elite desires is our money, power over our lives, the opportunity to control what we think and do, and increasingly the desire to know us inside out, to implement an ID card, not only in the UK but in those United States too. They are even touting plans to put microchips(called RFID) inside of us!!

Already in England, the government is ready to roll out a programme that would be able to track all vehicles in the UK from satellite, they talk about a new 'pay as you drive scheme', but don't bet that they will then abolish the Vehicle Tax once this has been implemented. Every vehicle in the country must now have a black box which records the speed of the vehicle, which can be checked by police at any time.

Now it they can do that with cars, imagine what they could do with us? Implant a chip and hey presto, they will have complete power over our lives. Granted they are probably too stupid to go round being deliberately evil, but you don't have to be smart to fuck someone life up!! Think of all the mistakes government and government agencies make on a regular basis!

Our masters continue to allow massive third world immigration, why? Not only to these people form a very handy pool of loyal votes, patrons of the government, they also are guaranteed to attack us, usually mugging us or raping our women, but the odd time they detonate a bomb on bus or a train, all very convenient for governments, who can grab more power and tell us they are doing this for our good!!!

When we protest we are labelled 'racists', 'homophobes', 'xenophobes', 'right wing nuts', 'mean' and they go on doing exactly what they always wanted to do, namely fuck us sideways.

It all seems so convenient, they unleash these savages on us, we get attacked and then the government, the very same people who unleashed the savages on us, come to our rescue, only there is a price, we must give up some liberty, just a small bit, not a lot, but then this happens year after year, always they come to rescue us from the same thing, the beast they have unleashed on us!

Strange no? Suspicious even?

Our elites are already too powerful, they control the MSM, education and every branch of government. They control the international establishment, trade and currencies. There is little we can do against such raw power and might, but, there is one thing you can do if you are a citizen of those United States, you can vote for Ron Paul and shake things up, this act could undo much that this international elite of slimy backstabbing shits, have worked so hard for over the past 60 years, go on please do us all a favour and vote Ron Paul.

Internet Crashes

2007-10-31T11:22:00.000Z

Breaking News: All Online Data Lost After Internet Crash

Ron Paul: A New Hope!

2007-10-22T15:22:00.000Z

Jean Charles de Menezes

2007-10-20T11:51:00.000Z

In those days after the bombings of July 7th, 2005, and the attempted bombings on the 21st July, we were on edge, my nerves were shot and when I heard that someone had been shot at Stockwell station I was actually happy, that the police had stopped another possible attack.

In the hours that followed we were told that the shot fellow had been seen running into the station with a bulky winter coat on, that he had vaulted the barriers and had refused to stop when police told him to.

Even when we found out the following day that the wrong guy had been shot, most of us continued to sympathise not with the dead fellow, but with the police, who, we were told, had genuinely believed they had to shoot de Menezes or that he would kill many more people.

Fair enough!

The fringe leftists who criticised the police were held in contempt, "who's side are you on anyway?" we asked, this is to protect us, not them!

I must say, looking at what we now know, how wrong I have been proved, how ashamed I am that I have said and written things about an innocent man, all because I trusted the police, an arm of this corrupt state.

I have believed the police when they reported that de Menezes was being investigated for the rape of some unnamed female, then they made a big point that he was an illegal immigrant (Well, so is half this city, at least he was working and not on welfare like some of them)

But now the Metropolitan Police are on trial, not for the murder of an Innocent man, but for 'breaching health and safety rules', that's great, a small fine at the end, some compo to the families and that should be the end of it?

The police were apparently watching an address in south London, where 'intelligence' what ever that means, indicated that a cell or those close to a cell of terrorists may have stayed. The police sit up to watch those leaving this block of flats, they see Jean Charles leave the building, but because one of the police officers is taking a piss, they can't send an image of de Menezes back to New Scotland Yard for Cressida Dick( the head honcho) to view to see if it matches the image of Hussain Osman, one of the previous days attempted bombers.

So, on one officers say so, Dick (an apt name considering her history in the Metropolitan Police)gave the order to pursue de Menezes and prevent him from entering the Underground.

A team followed him on to a bus, they could see very clearly that he was not wearing a bulky coat, but a light Summer coat, he had no bag with him as he had left it at work the previous day and was on the phone to a friend telling him he was going to be late to a job in Kilburn where he was going to fix a faulty fire alarm.

He got off at Brixton, saw that it was closed and got back on the bus to go to next station, at Stockwell he got off and walked, he did not run, he walked into the station, picked up a metro paper, got out his oyster card and opened the gate strolling down the escalator, check out this link to see Jean Charles de Menezes' last moments of life.

See how he is not running, as we were told, it is the police who run, and after he is shot the public who run up the escalators to get away from some terror they don't wish to see. The accounts given to us, state that some undercover police officers were sitting by de Menezes, that when the armed officers got on the train, the undercover officers yelled to the armed officers, 'he is here', that de Menezes got up and 'went for them', what ever that means? The police held de Meneses, the man with no suicide belt on, as he was wearing a light open summer coat, he had no weapons as he was not carrying anything with him, and he was given no warning at any time.

If he did indeed try to get away, perhaps he had twigged that something was not right about the men about him? Perhaps he thought they were immigration police, and perhaps he struggled, because unlike the Brazilian police most police officers here do not carry guns and if they do, are unlikely to use them?

So the armed police then hold de Menezes down and shoot him, not once or twice or three times but 8 times, seven bullets to his head one to his shoulder, the other 3 shots missed de Menezes, this from the self proclaimed 'crack' firearms unit at point blank range!

Now, I can understand someone killing someone if they believe they are a threat to their life, or the lives of others, but these officers did not at any time even attempt to warm de Menezes, not once! Why? Every scumbag in London will get a police warning even if they are only to get a fine, why was de Menezes just shot, and shot so many times? There was obviously no place for him to have a bomb, no where, he was wearing a light jacket which was open, where the hell did they think think the bomb was? do these officers just randomly shoot people to death for fun or something? Do they have any conscience?

Left: de Menezes, dead on a train carriage, note his jacket!

Jean Charles de Menezes was an illegal immigrant, that is true, but so are millions of others, others who scrounge off my taxes, who mug and rape all round them, who will never work and will only take, take take.

Jean Charles de Menezes was a working man, someone who did not take my taxes, he probably avoided paying tax, but then, so does anyone who can do so, I have little problem with people wanting to keep their own money instead of letting the government steal it.

The police murdered an innocent man, they made mistake after mistake (apparently, the block of flats they were watching, well that 'intelligence' was in fact bogus, so much for 'police intelligence' eh?)

Once they realised that they had murdered an innocent man, the senior management at New Scotland Yard panicked like a bunch of girls! The Commissioner Sir Ian Blair undoubtedly knew that they had killed the wrong man on that very day, even before the statement he gave linking the shooting with the 'ongoing investigation' into the previous days attacks. Blair lied.

The next day when they finally admitted that this was not a terrorist that they had killed but an innocent man, they insisted that the previous days account remained true, even though at that early stage, there were already witnesses making statements insisting de Menezes did not vault the barriers and was not running. The Metropolitan Police continued a lie.

The Met told us there was no CCTV at that station as all CCTV had been removed from all stations due to the investigation of the previous days attempted attacks. Metronet, the company that up keeps the CCTV refuted this and finally the Met were forced to admit, yes there was CCTV, the Met again lied and seems to me were attempting a cover up.

left: Still frames from that fateful day

The Met tried to smear de Menezes with that 'rape' allegation from an unnamed female, they were forced to admit a few months later that there was no truth whatsoever in those allegations, and now a few days ago the Metropolitan Police state that there was cocaine in the blood of de Menezes. Perhaps, but what of it? Many people snort coke, perhaps it was some cocaine based medicine? But here we see the police attempt another smear to justify their wanton and reckless murder of an innocent man and their failure to prevent another terrorist attack just a fortnight after the July 7th attacks.

Apparently, Jean Charles de Menezes resembles this guy? How they figured that is bizarre! What is laughable about this situation, is the police murder an innocent man, yet the scumbag they should have killed just got on a Eurostar train at Waterloo and left the country for Paris! This on the evening after the attempted attacks, and with an All Ports Warning in effect!

It seems to me that we put too much trust in the police, these are the same people who support the the ID card so they can stop us in the street willy nilly, they are the same people who arrest those who don't celebrate homosexual perversion or multi-culturalism, the very thing that allows terrorists into our nation.

They bully decent hardworking people who drive, arresting those who have had a few pints after work or who are going a few miles over the speed limit, and these are the same people who shoot innocent men on the Underground without without having the decency to inform them of their reasons to do so.

The police are not 'for us' any more, they stopped being 'for us ' a long time time ago when they became enforcers for the new socialist state we now live in, they are Blair's men, Brown's men and like them they have become liars and murderers.

Jean Charles de Menezes leaves his mother and father to mourn him, they who live in a poor part of Brazil, who had hoped for so much for their son Jean Charles, they who sent him to live with his uncle in Sao Paolo to study to be an electrician, to leave poverty behind. They will have some money now due to the Met trying to shut them up with some compo, but I think they would rather the Met was not as incompetent as they are, that if they must shoot someone, it will be deserved and if they make a mistake, resignations and prosecutions would commence without all the attempts at smears on the victim and wriggling by the management to get out of an uncomfortable situation.

And me, well, I shall never again assume that the police are trustworthy, I shall never again go along with their smears and lies, I shall endeavour to seek the truth rather then be someone who justifies their mistakes and wrongdoings.

If I could, I would apologise to Jean Charles de Menezes and his family for my ignorant remarks and unjustified smearing of a good man. May God forgive me and may Jean Charles rest in peace.

Jean Charles de Menezes, January 7th 1978 - July 22nd 2005

Links:

Wikipedia Article

de Menezes photo manipulated

Officer 'proud' of squad

Officer knew de Menezes was not the man

Cocaine abuse could have made de Menezes 'paranoid'

The case against the Met

Justice for Jean

Western mediocrity.

2007-10-12T13:54:00.000Z

I have recently been watching X Factor, the public auditions, and a few weeks ago the BBC did an India season, with various documentaries on India 'celebrating' 60 years of Indian independence.

Usually I would watch neither, as reality TV is off putting at the best of times, and it annoys me when the BBC 'celebrates' another nations anniversary, yet fails to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Act of Union between England and Scotland which created this nation, but hey ho!

What I found interesting is how trivial this nation has become, how immature and how lacking in ambition are the Britons of today compared to the Indians.

In India, young Indians love their country, they are proud of their history and have real ambitions. Ambitions that will benefit their people and enrich their lives and those of their families.

In contrast, young Britons as seen on the X Factor are sad, fat, ugly, ignorant and completely unaware of how talentless they are. How many times can you hear from these ugly, obese and talentless individuals, "this has always been my dream, this is what I will do" and "I will be back next year, I will prove them wrong"?

The Indians however were aspiring to be engineers, doctors and architects, they were engrossed in study, yes they loved their trashy bollywood movies, but they knew were fantasy and reality lay.

The Brits, having been miseducated for generations by clueless socialists with egalitarian ideology, that taught 'everyone is special' are consumed by their own fantasies of being the next Britney Spears (why anyone would want to be her amazes me) or Christina Aguilera, but minus the looks and voice. Someone has obviously told them they are good, good enough to go on a TV reality show and be chosen to get a contract to sing.

In the Indian documentaries I watched, there was a programme about an Indian school in southern India, they showed the children practising for a local talent competition, some chose to do modern bollywood dance, others more traditional Indian dances, what stuck me was they took this seriously, practised for months and once at the competition were told in no uncertain terms whether they were good or not, the children may have cried, but knew the truth and knew that it was not cruel, but only the truth.

So many of the waddling mounds of flab on the X Factor seemed never to have had any lessons or practice, they seemed to really believe that a 18 stone teenager could get through the auditions, and when told they were not good enough threw a strop and had their equally flabby parents wobble into the audition room to harangue the judges!!!

I was struck, because this seems to me a metaphor for how certain nations are on the rise and others, unknowingly (mainly due to ignorance and idleness) are in decline. Serious nations, as Britain used to be, have good schools, rigorous examinations, disciplined training which results in engineers, doctors, businessmen, risk takers and other productive people. This is how nations manage to conquer empires and become wealthy.

Trivial nations exalt celebrity, mediocrity and ignorance, resulting in poverty and moral squalor. The only reason I can see that Britain is not already poor is because the accumulated wealth of our past is not yet spent, however with Gordon Brown on the case, raising taxes every year and borrowing hundreds of billions every year to throw away on a health service that does not work and on benefits for third world scroungers so that they will continue to vote for him, it may not be long before we find we are broke and end up being a tourist theme park for wealthy and hardworking Chinese and Indians.

How ironic and deserved that would be.

The Swiss and the Poles, God love 'em

2007-10-12T10:47:00.000Z

Both Switzerland and Poland are the new enemies of the left, they have committed the ultimate blasphemy of rejecting the self destructive ideologies of those that hate the white Christian West.

Switzerland has elected a 'right wing' party into government, a party opposed to immigration and multi-culturalism. A party explicitly pro-Swiss. Those lucky Swiss bastards!

The New York Times is horrified; "As part of its platform, the SVP party has begun a campaign seeking the 100,000 signatures necessary to force a referendum to let judges deport foreigners after they serve prison sentences for serious crimes. The measure also calls for the deportation of the entire family if the convicted criminal is a minor.

Human rights advocates warn that the initiative is reminiscent of the Nazi practice of Sippenhaft, or kin liability, under which relatives of criminals were held responsible and punished for their crimes. "

This policy sounds a quite sensible one, I and many I speak to would gladly support it, only those untouched by the feral packs of black men that roam the streets of this once great city, would think the above statement abhorrent.

The New York Times is also in shock at a few posters produced by the SVP (Swiss Peoples Party) one shows a black sheep with some white sheep and the words 'For Security'. the other I managed to find on the net (shown bellow), shows the hands of non-whites trying to grab Swiss passports, which if any of you know what Africans are like will recognise immediately as all too true.

The left, so used to us meekly giving in to threats and bullying are shocked by this insolence from us plebs, how dare we stand up for ourselves, how dare nasty white people do anything that may result in Africans getting deported or getting less benefits, shock horror!!

The Poles, well they are far too Christian to be true 'Europeans' in the Brussels sense of the word, which invariably means, atheist, cynical, effete, promiscuous, contemptuous of our past, our race and our culture.

On Wednesday 10 October 2007 was "European day against the death penalty." The EU wanted to inaugurate the event with a common European declaration against capital punishment. Poland thwarted this by refusing to sign the declaration because the EU did not condemn abortion and euthanasia as well. Last month, during an EU meeting on the death penalty, the Polish justice minister confronted his Danish colleague with Denmark's annual 15,000 abortions and the latter — a member of the Danish Conservative Party — got so angry that she left the room, slamming the door."

I must say, I admire the balls of the Poles, but instead of being ashamed of their double standards, what do the other states do, well Portugal and Belgium accuse Poland of being immoral! Just how did they manage to reason that one out?

"Richard Howitt, a British Labor politician and the vice president of the European Parliament's human rights subcommittee, said that Poland's refusal to reject the death penalty brings into question its commitment to European values."

Again, these values are as stated above, atheism, cynicism, promiscuity and contempt for who we are, seems to me a virtue to lack 'European values'.

"Last April, the European Parliament accused Poland of 'homophobia" because it does not want to include homosexuality in the school curriculum. Last May, the European Court of Human Rights found Poland guilty of violating human rights because it banned a "gay pride" parade in Warsaw. Last year, the European Commission threatened to deprive Warsaw of its voting rights in the European institutions if it remained in "serious breach of its obligations on human rights."

Banning a parade of degenerate perverts from performing sex acts on each other in public is banned, and this is bad? Do you see how inverted morality in this 'Europe' truly is? Not poisoning children's minds with gay porn is somehow wrong? Wrong for whom? Normal people, faggots, perverts, paedophiles?

What is wrong with these people? They seem intent on dismantling all normality, all common sense, all morality and rightness for what? There must be an aim these sodomites have in mind?

The final and complete destruction of the white Christian West seems to be their intent, why import millions of Muslims and Africans otherwise? Why encourage us to breed with 'ethnics' or not to breed at all? Why sponsor and celebrate sodomy as if it were a sacrament of modern socialism?

Those people in charge of this new Europe are evil, and that is not an exaggeration, they are committed to our destruction, to the genocide of the white peoples, to the extermination of Christendom. They have committed themselves to every depravity in the cause of weakening and demoralising the white man and they must be stopped. Democracy is a sham they use to control us, they feign difference between them at election time, one part poses as the right and the other as the left, when in fact both are as committed as each other, to the radical theories of the Jacobins and Bolsheviks.

The Jacobins destroyed France and raped the soul of that great nation, the Bolsheviks ripped out the heart of Holy Russia and stamped on it destroying it in the process, now their heirs unite to finish off Europe and the white race as a whole.

God help us

The Evil Empire

2007-07-10T21:40:00.000Z

Europe is not so much a league of nations, it seems it is an empire! So says José Manuel Barroso the President of the European Commission(and former marxist)

"Sometimes I like to compare it to compare the EU as a creation to the organisation of empires. We have the dimension of Empire but there is a great difference. Empires were usually made with force with a centre imposing diktat, a will on the others. Now what we have is the first non-Imperial empire. We have 27 countries that fully decided to work together and to pool their sovereignty. I believe it is a great construction and we should be proud of it. At least, we in the Commission are proud of it."

Well, I never thought of Europe as an Empire, but I suppose as our emperor in waiting has said, it most likely will form an empire in Europe crushing our ancient liberties(whats left of them) and assuming absolute power over our lives.

Well, I feel so much better now!

Link

The limits of Liberty: We are all suspects now!

2007-07-08T22:01:00.000Z

On new year’s day 1990, three days after becoming president of Czechoslovakia, Vaclav Havel looked his people in the eye and spoke to them as no one had done before. It is difficult to read his words without feeling the vibration of history of both the liberation and the horrors of the regime that had just expired, leaving the Czech people blinking in the cold sunlight of that extraordinary winter.

This is what he said. "The previous regime, armed with its arrogance and intolerant ideology, reduced man to a force of production. It reduced gifted and autonomous people to nuts and bolts of some monstrously huge, noisy, stinking machine whose real meaning was not clear to anyone. It could do no more but slowly and inexorably wear itself out, and all the nuts and bolts too."

That perfectly defines the true tyranny, where the state takes all liberty and bends each individual will to its own purpose. And here is the interesting thing that Havel put his finger on: no matter how brutal or ruthless the regime, the act of depriving people of their freedom starts the stopwatch on that regime’s inevitable demise. What he was saying was that in modern times a state can only thrive in the fullest sense when individuals are accorded maximum freedom.

I agree. Individual liberty is not just the precondition for civilisation, not just morally right, not just the only way people can reach their full potential, live responsibly and have fun; it is also a necessity for the health of government. Ten years ago I would have felt silly speaking about liberty and rights in Britain with the very real concern that I have today.

But I am worried. And it’s not just me. Last month Le Monde asked "Is Democracy Dying in the West?".

In the spring of this year Lord Steyn, the distinguished former law lord, made a speech despairing at this Government’s neglect for the Rule of Law, which was followed by Baroness (Helena) Kennedy’s alarm call in the James Cameron Lecture.

The inescapable fact is that we have a Prime Minister who repeatedly makes the point that civil liberties arguments are not so much wrong as made for another age [my italics]. We have a Government that has ignored the Rule of Law, reduced rights and has steadily moved to increase the centralised power of the state at the expense of the individual.

So I don’t feel quite as silly or as alarmist as I might.

The relationship between the state and individual is really at the heart of any discussion about democracy and rights. In Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union it was the state’s mission not just to prevent people from expressing themselves, from moving about freely and unobserved, from pursuing their chosen careers and acting upon their religious and political convictions, but to stop them from thinking freely. It needed to occupy people’s thoughts - to take up a kind of permanent residency in the mind of the average citizen. And as the many psychological studies published in the Nineties make clear, this led to psychic disrepair on a massive scale - paranoia, clinical depression, chronic internalised anger and learned helplessness.

We fell morally ill, Havel said in that speech, because we became used to saying something different from what we thought. We learned not to believe in anything, to ignore one another, to care only about ourselves. Concepts such as love, friendship, compassion, humility or forgiveness lost their depth and dimensions, and for many of us represented only psychological peculiarities.

Why am I harping on about communism? It died and was buried 17 years ago, at least in Europe and Russia. We’re into another century. We’ve got Google and speed-dating and globalisation and melting ice caps and reality TV and al-Qa’ida and al-Jazeera and Al Gore. We’ve moved on.

As a character in Alan Bennett’s The History Boys says, there is no period more remote in history than the recent past. Indeed, but we need to remember that recent past a little more than we do. For one thing, our knowledge of what existed on the other side of the Iron Curtain meant we valued and looked after our own freedoms much more than we do today.

It is perhaps the absence of an obvious confrontation between freedom and tyranny that allows Tony Blair to say that civil liberties arguments are made for another age. I profoundly disagree with this. It is dangerous arrogance to say that the past has nothing to teach us and that all the problems we face now are unique to our time.

During his speech to the Labour Party conference, Tony Blair said: "I don’t want to live in a police state, or a Big Brother society or put any of our essential freedoms in jeopardy. But because our idea of liberty is not keeping pace with change in reality, those freedoms are in jeopardy."

What in heaven’s name did he mean by that? Liberty is liberty. You can’t update it. You can’t divide it. You are either free, or you’re not. A society is either just, or it isn’t. People have rights or they don’t. The rule of law is upheld, or it isn’t.

But Blair believes there is nothing that can’t be modernised, updated, pared down or streamlined to keep pace with change. And liberty is no exception to the modernising fury which serves as New Labour’s only ideological foundation. What the Prime Minister is saying in this cute little Orwellian paradox is that in the particular circumstances of the war on terror and the rash of crime and anti-social behaviour, we must give up freedom to be free.

What an odd idea! Who is to decide which freedoms are essential and which can be sacrificed to make us secure? Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Lord Falconer or the former Stalinist and now Home Secretary John Reid?

"Those who would give up essential liberty," observed Benjamin Franklin, "to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither freedom or safety." That’s exactly right because you can’t barter one for the other even though that has been the tempting deal on offer from the British and American governments since 9/11. The truth of the matter is that relinquishing our rights in exchange for illusory security harms each one of us, and our children and grandchildren. Because once gone, these rights hardly ever return.

But let’s just return to the first part of that statement by Tony Blair - the bit about him not wanting to live in a police state, or a Big Brother society. Don’t get me wrong, we do not live in either a police state or a Big Brother society - yet. But there is no Englishman alive or dead who has done more to bring them about.

The trouble is that it’s happening so very quietly, so very discreetly that few really see it. You have to concentrate very hard to understand what’s going on and put the whole picture together because so much has been buried in obscure corners of legislation.

We used to believe in innocence until guilt was proved by a court. Not any longer. That distinction disappeared when the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force and police started taking innocent people’s DNA and fingerprints and treating them as a convicted criminals.

We used to believe in Habeas Corpus. Not any longer. Under terrorism laws, suspects may be held for 28 days without being charged. Now the Home Secretary wants to make that 90 days, and Gordon Brown seems to share that view.

We used to believe that there should be no punishment without a court deciding the law had been broken, and that every defendant had the right to know the evidence against him. Not any longer. Control orders effectively remove both those rights and John Reid said recently that he wanted stronger powers to detain and control, and stronger powers to deport, which would clearly require the UK to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights.

We used to believe that an Englishman’s home was his castle. Not any longer. A pincer movement by the Courts Act 2003 and the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 put paid to the 400-year-old principle that entry into your home could not be forced in civil cases.

We used to believe in the right to be tried by jury. Not any longer. The Government plans to remove trial by jury in complicated fraud cases and where there is a likelihood of jury tampering. It would like to go further.

We used to believe there was a good reason not to allow hearsay evidence in court. Not any longer. The anti-social behaviour order legislation introduced hearsay evidence. The maximum penalty for breaking an Asbo can be up to five years in jail. Hearsay can send someone to jail.

We used to believe in free speech, but not any longer. People have been detained under terrorism laws for wearing anti-Blair T-shirts. Walter Wolfgang was removed from the Labour Conference for heckling Jack Straw about the Iraq war. A woman was charged under the Harassment Act for sending two e-mails to a company politely asking them not to conduct animal experiments. Her offence was to send two e-mails, for in that lies the repeated action that is now illegal. A man named Stephen Jago was arrested for displaying a placard quoting Orwell near Downing Street. It read: "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." And a mime artist named Neil Goodwin appeared in court recently charged under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act for what? Well, doing an impersonation of Charlie Chaplin outside Parliament. His hearing was a grim comedy. Mr Goodwin’s statement to the court concluded: "In truth, one of the first things to go under a dictatorship is a good sense of humour."

We used to believe that our private communications were sacrosanct. Not any longer. The Regulatory Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and its subsequent amendments provide such wide terms for the legitimate tapping of phones, the interception of e-mails and monitoring of internet connections that they amount to general warrants, last used in the 18th century under George III.

I could go on because there is much more, but I worry about boring you and I know I am beginning to seem obsessed. There will be many reasonable people among you who will argue that the fight against terrorism or some other compelling problem makes the removal of a fragment of liberty the best option available to us.

A little bit here, a little bit there doesn’t really matter, particularly when it involves somebody else’s rights. Without thinking very deeply, we say to ourselves "if you’ve done nothing wrong you’ve got nothing to fear from these new laws". Not true. There is something to fear - because someone else’s liberty is also your liberty. When it’s removed from them, it’s taken from you even though you may not be able to conceive of the circumstances when you might need it. A system of rights must apply to bank managers, illegal immigrant cockle pickers and every type of defendant otherwise it doesn’t count.

Cumulatively, these small, barely noticed reductions in our rights add up to the greatest attack on liberty in the last hundred years. No wonder the Prime Minister dismisses traditional civil liberties arguments as being made for another age. With his record he can do nothing else.
In an e-mail exchange between him and me in the spring, he suggested a kind of super Asbo for major criminals. This is what the unmediated Blair sounds like. "I would go further. I would widen the powers of police to seize cash of suspected [my italics] drug dealers, the cars they drive round in and require them to prove that they came by them lawfully. I would impose restrictions on those suspected of being involved in organised crime. In fact I would harry, hassle and hound them until they give up or leave the country."

I’m sure that echoes many people’s desire just to be rid of these awful people. But think about it for a moment: Tony Blair is a lawyer, yet nowhere is there any mention of due process or the courts. Apparently it will be enough for the authorities merely to suspect someone of wrongdoing for them to act. And the police won’t be troubled by the tiresome business of courts, defence lawyers or defendants’ rights. I wonder what Vaclav Havel would think of such a suggestion. Certainly, he would be all too familiar with the system of arbitrary arrest and state persecution that Blair seems to be suggesting.

Blair dresses up his views in a vocabulary of modernisation and inclusivity. Yet when he talks about rebalancing the criminal justice system in favour of the victim, it takes just a few moments to see that this will be achieved by doing away with the priority in our legal system of protecting the accused from miscarriages of justice. He simply wants to reduce defendants’ rights in order to satisfy public demand for more prosecutions.

It is now plain that he intends nothing less than to open the ancient charters of British rights in order to tip acid into them.

The way cabinet ministers think of themselves today and what they do are at odds. They think of themselves as reasonable, tolerant, humane and liberal people, but their actions tell an altogether different story. This brings me to the Big Brother state that Tony Blair says he doesn’t want to live in, but which has nevertheless rapidly come into being during his premiership.

Most people have very little understanding of what the ID card scheme will actually mean for them. They think that it just involves a little plastic identifier. But it is much more than that. Every adult will be required to provide 49 pieces of information about themselves which will include biometric measurements - probably an iris scan and fingerprinting. If you refuse to submit to what is called, without irony, enrolment, you will face repeated fines of up £2,500. The Government is deadly serious about this thing because of a simple truth. They want to know pretty much everything there is to know about you.

Personally, I find the idea of having a card repugnant and I cannot believe it will be long before policemen are stopping us on the street and asking for our papers. But this is by no means the most sinister aspect. Every time your card is swiped when you identify yourself, the National Identity Register will silently make a record of the time and date, your location and the purpose of the ID check. Gradually, a unique picture of your life will be built, to which nearly half-a-million civil servants are apparently going to have access.

But of course you will never be told who is looking at your file, or why. And nor will you be able to find out.

MPs must take responsibility for passing this invasive law but they cannot be blamed for the other half of the Big Brother society that is upon us. I refer to the total surveillance of our roads in a linked-up system of Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras. These cameras cover every motorway, major dual carriageway, town and city centre and will feed information from billions of journeys into one computer, where the data will remain for two years.

The decision to put British motorists under blanket, round- the-clock surveillance was never taken by Parliament. It just happened. As the cost of processing enormous quantities of data came down, the police and Home Office just simply decided to go ahead. Traffic cameras became surveillance cameras. This, I gather, is known as function creep, and, as always, half the pressure comes from technological innovation.

We are about to become the most observed population in the world outside North Korea, and absolutely no work has been done on how this will affect each one of us and what it will do to our society and political institutions.

I worry that we are not alert to the possibilities of social control. No matter how discreet this surveillance, it increases the spectral presence of the state in the everyday consciousness of each individual. I grant that it is a slow process and that it is nothing like the leaden omnipresence of the Stasi in the GDR. But I think we’re heading for a place from which we will not be able to return: the surveillance society where the state will crowd in on the individual human experience and threaten the unguarded freedoms of privacy, solitude, seclusion and anonymity. We may continue to attest to the feeling of freedom but in reality we will suffer more and more restrictions. Inexorably we are becoming subjects not citizens, units on a database that may be observed and classified by a Government which is taking control in areas where it has never dared in democratic times to trespass before.

Where this will all lead I cannot say, but I do know that it is neither good for us nor for the state. Humans work best when they have the maximum freedom, and so does government. As our Government gains more power in relation to us, confusing itself on the way with the entity and interests of the state, it will become less responsive to our needs and opinions, less transparent and less accountable.

Havel said of the Communist tyranny in that glorious but sombre new year’s day speech: "None of us is just its victim. We are its co-creators." That is true of any society. And I believe we all need now to acknowledge what has happened to British rights and do something about it.

Firstly, there needs to be some kind of formal audit made of the rights which have been already compromised. An exact account. Linked to this should be a commission looking into the effects of mass surveillance. Second, we need a constitution which enshrines a bill of rights and places our rights beyond the reach of an ambitious Executive and Parliament. Third, we should be writing to our constituency MPs or clogging up their surgeries - asking what they are doing about the attack on liberty. And fourth, all schoolchildren should be taught about British rights and freedoms, what they mean and how they were won. History, as the National Trust is fond of saying, matters. Rights and liberties are as much a part of our heritage as St Paul’s Cathedral and Shakespeare’s plays.

This may all sound rather prescriptive but I have become certain over the last two years that we need to do something to save us from our Government and the Government from itself.

This was taken from the Summerfield Lecture given at the Everyman Theatre, Cheltenham, on 12 October as part of the annual literary festival. Research by Emily Butselaar

Source

Men of the West!

2007-07-07T22:03:00.000Z

Why are you in awe of the state? Why do you defer to it? Why do you trust it so?

The state is the very essence of wickedness, it is an organism which desires to grow, to become more powerful, more potent, wealthier and ever more omnipresent.

This same state extorts half your wage, actively campaigns against you, accusing you of racism, homophobia, sexism, bigotry and theft.

It takes your children from you to inculcate them in the sinister knowledgeless drivel that they want your children to parrot when questioned. This propaganda continues into university, places once famed for their knowledge and research, now they are supplicant to the almighty state.

In your work place there is the ever present threat of dismissal if you say the wrong thing or think the wrong thought, legislated by the state. Every action on the road is legislated against.

Everything you wish to pursue must be licenced, fishing, hunting, driving, marriage, flying, travelling(passport) etc...

The state wishes to know you, to control you and possess you!

The state is your enemy.

Men of the West, it is time to stand up against this growing tyranny.

It is time to destroy it.

Blair is gone!

2007-07-06T18:57:00.000Z

I will admit it, Gordon Brown, so far, is head and shoulders above Tony Blair and his badly acted expressions of concern for what ever it is that is the front page of that day!

In last weeks attempted attacks Brown held off calling dozens of press conferences, complete with crocodile tears, he held off promises of new 'tough' laws and he avoided turning parliament into a Gordon Brown 'fan club' as Tony Blair did the previous week with all that pathetic and unparliamentary applause given to that buffoon.

That's not to say I like Brown, it is just that in comparison to that prancing actor Blair, anyone can look good!

Thank God Blair is gone, it feels so good to be liberated from a decade of lies, spin, deceit, overweening self importance and self righteousness. It is a relief that I wont have endure another one of his many 'innovations' or destructive 'reforms' in his campaign to make this nation something it is not!

It is also a relief to have that harpie of a woman Cherie (what a stupid name) gone as well, hopefully the spouse of the PM will go back into the background where they belong, unlike the US we do not vote in a couple and do not have a 'First Lady' as some people infuriatingly entitled that meddlesome hack of a QC! The closest thing to a First Lady we have is the Queen, the de jure head of state in case anyone has forgotten over these past 10 years!

I really don't know what people saw in that man, but you voted him in 3 times on the trot, good for you, well I suppose that is 'democracy' in action.

And that creep Cameron giving that criminal and traitor a standing ovation? What the fucks wrong with him? The Tories stood and applauded someone who has degraded this nation, given away its independence, increased taxes like no other government in recent times, plundered private pensions, unleashed the third world upon us, with threats to lock up those who opposed it. Blair is a criminal and a traitor and I hope his treasonous and silly signing of the International Criminal Court back fires on him and he ends up in the Hague on war crimes charges, that would be funny and all to well deserved for a man of his dubious distinction.

Brown, although complicit in the crimes and treason of Blair, is for the moment a breath of fresh air, I have no doubt that I will despise him as well in the not to distant future, although I can't imagine hating him as much as I hate Blair, but until then I will enjoy this Blairless government!

It is also good to see Prescott, Margaret Becket, that daft tart Patricia Hewitt and John Reid gone as well, although now we have to endure that sleazy, amoral, career politician David Milliband as Foreign Secretary!

Ah well, it cant be all good I suppose!

The Democratic State!

2007-06-13T18:37:00.000Z

An intersting quote I found, if you replace 'Republican' with Conservative and 'Democrat' with Labour, it could be talking about England!

The Republican party is thought to be the party of free enterprise, small government, and family values. It is actually the party of state capitalism.

The Democratic Party is thought to be the party of the common people. It is actually the party of international finance and elitist social engineering.

Federal aid is thought to have improved public education. It has actually made it worse.

Federal expenditures on medical care are thought to have made it more available. They have actually only made it more expensive.

The mass media are thought to be vigilant watchdogs of government abuse. They are actually lackeys of power.

College professors are thought to exemplify bold and independent thinking. Actually, aside from the productive 5 percent, they are timid, conformist, and unoriginal.

Federal judges are thought to be steeped in the wisdom of the Constitution. They actually know less than nothing about the real American Founding.

It is widely believed that, as stated in a recent Congressional resolution, American slavery was among the most brutal systems of servitude in history. Actually it was among the mildest.

It is widely believed that any symptoms of social dysfunction in the black community are a result of slavery. Actually, the problems are worse the farther they are from the time and place of slavery.

Down with the Commons, restore the House of Lords!

Source

Whats so great about democracy?

2007-06-13T09:56:00.000Z

Blair, Bush, Brown and all the others 'leaders' make a big huh hah over something called 'democracy' or 'democratic rights', it sounds great if you don't think to hard!

What the hell's democracy anyway?

This present government was elected with about a quarter of the national vote, but got well over half the seats. Is that democracy?

This government has signed numerous European Treaties into law without asking the people of this nation. Is that democracy?

They abolished the old pound shillings and pence without consulting the people, they foisted the metric system on us, and prosecute traders who sell in pounds and ounces, even though no one thinks in kilograms! Is that your precious democracy?

This government and previous governments have allowed millions, yes that's right, millions of immigrants and refugees to pour into the nation in what can only be describes as a slow motion government sponsored genocide of the indigenous peoples of these islands. Is this democracy?

Democracy is in fact a weasel word! It is meaningless! Democracy can be anything you want it to be, as proved by this current government and their sleazy ways of doing things.

Democracy is a cover for the criminal and coward, it gives a fig leaf of respectability when they are up to no good. They just claim, 'this is democracy in action', 'this is the will of the people' etc, etc...

The fact that I can scrawl a mark on a piece of paper every 5 years means shit! What a big fucking deal, that really makes a fucking difference! And if you think it does make a difference, you are delusional!

At most it makes minor changes now and then, the real power in this nation is the propaganda, used, harnessed and marketed by amoral prostitutes such as Rupert Murdoch, who is only out to make yet more money( this is the guy who renounced his citizenship, so he could take up American citizenship to own a few rags and Fox)

They could not care less who is in power, as long as they are good for business! It seems strange, in 1997, the press, the entire press was going through some sort of religious experience with regards Tony Blair, I was convinced Labour would annihilate the Tories, and then they did.

What was not told was that Blair got less votes nationwide in 1997 then Major got in 1992. 14,093,007 for Major in 1992 and Blair's 1997 landslide of 13,518,167, not to worry, this story was buried as it would not fit in with the media induced anti-Tory atmosphere!

That would be hard to do now as we have this fine medium to garner news and information from, but back then, the internet was used exclusively for porn.

Remember it is perception that wins out!

Democracy, what a crock of shit, it has abolished capital punishment, legalised abortion, liberalised divorce, decriminalised homosexuality, joined the European Union, signed up to the International Criminal Court, the European Court of Human Rights. Democracy resulted in the legalised sodomising of 16 year olds, pot smoking junkies on every corner, tens of thousands of Gypsies begging and thieving in every city centre, Somalian teenaged boys, running around in gangs robbing and raping all around them, Muslims preaching death to the infidel and detonating themselves on public transport.

This is democracy, this is what it is! Every single thing mentioned above was qualified when passed, when capital punishment was abolished, they promised us that 'life would mean life', they lied, life now means 5 years in prison, murder actually pays in this country!

When abortion was passed, they vowed it was a very limited type of abortion, only those women who were physically unable or who were mentally unable would be allowed abort a child, they lied here too. We now effectively have abortion on demand.

When they decriminalised homosexuality, they said it would not be the thin end of the wedge, that this was a humane thing to do, perhaps, but with this they lied and betrayed us too. We now have gay marriage, gay adoption and 40 year old men sodomising 16 year old boys.

Immigration is something we have been lied to by these cynical fucks for the past 40 years. Some parts of this country are no longer British, they have minarets towering over the streets, women walking about in shawls or burqas. We have white women being raped, or just shagged by these ethnics and then left when they fall pregnant. We have whole streets strewn with filth and rubbish like some Algerian casbah. Gypsies, everywhere, with their filthy nasty offspring they beg on the corners and on the underground, they pick pocket and thieve, and when caught they wipe vaginal fluids on the police officers so as to make an allegation of sexual assault latter on. These politicians, these democratically elected politicians lied to us about this too, they assured us that immigration would be controlled.

These democratically elected politicians lied, lied and lied again. This in a democracy!

Perhaps it's time we had a bit more aristocracy or monarchy?

The House of Lords has always been more sensible then that other house, the house of scoundrels and liars and thieves. The house of Lords worked and worked well because they were not elected, they did not have to make vacuous statements, they did not have to make promises that they would break, they did not even have to turn up if they did not have the interest, they went unpaid with no offices. How glorious is that? A house full of people there not through lies and theft and cheating and party hackery, but there because of an accident of birth, some plonkers yes, but they usually did not bother to ever turn up, but the great minds, the decent men who would never have otherwise spoken in Parliament or stood for election as they had lives to live and did not have to temerity to lie so readily.

Well, that house of thieves and scum has chased out the decent house, no more hereditary peers, no more unelected Dukes or Barons or Earls, good men, decent patriotic men who attempted to revise the worst legislation vomited up from the lower house, they also had great and honest debates regarding the great issues of the day, something the rightly entitled lower house would never deign to debate!

What is so great about democracy?

I really can only think of waste, lies and wickedness unbound from their stained and immoral hands.

Democracy, it's an expensive destructive lie!

I wish for my liberty, the freedom to live as I wish, democracy and democratically elected politicians are in direct opposition to this aim.

The best thing for us all would be to abolish the House of Commons, and restore the House of Lords in all its former glory and power!

Then perhaps we can rest and live our lives as we would, knowing their lordships are directing the affairs of state with wisdom and humility not lying to us, not sleezing about for votes not steeling from us!

Let the cry be heard, Abolish the Commons!

Snow Patrol

2007-06-03T10:40:00.000Z

I love Snow Patrol, I also love this video, I can almost beleive that I'm speeding around Paris on a moped myself! Tres cool!

Watch out for the pigeons!

Abortion, Catholic Cardinal tells it as it is!

2007-06-02T01:37:00.000Z

It seems that Catholic Bishops are no longer allowed to speak out against what they believe to be sin, unless that sin happens to be 'war', 'racism' and the other fashionable 'isms' of today!

Some poor Cardinal found this out when he committed his own 'sin' (in the eyes of the holier then thou left wing theocratic state) when he condemned abortion and asked people to think twice before supporting people claiming to be Catholics when they support abortion!

He also asked Catholic politicians to reassess their connections to the Church and the suitability of supporting abortion and taking communion!

Predictably the poor fellow has been smeared by the usual nihilists and hard core atheists at the BBC, if you look at Biased BBC, Thursday 31st May post, you will see that they have noted that the BBC has framed this whole story differently from another similar story a while back. But one story is about the Archbishop of Canterbury condemning the government for going to war, something the BBC loves to hear from anyone, even some fuddy duddy fairy tale believer! But, the other involves abortion, something the left venerates as much as any Catholic venerates Mary or one of the Saints!

It is part of the left wing belief system, abortion is seen as one of their sacraments, a noble thing to do, something that guarantees a woman's continued independence from all that old fashioned non - sense, family, faith, humility and love!

What we are now supposed to cleave to is sexual incontinence, wild lust, and complete independence from other people. If we do need to depend on someone, it will be the state, the state will be there when you are born, it will register you, and create a number for you (National Insurance Number) they will pay child care so the mother can go to work, if she does not want to work, well, they will just raise the taxes until no one can afford to support a family with one income!

Then with both parents at work, the child is there ready to be indoctrinated by this behemoth state, always well meaning, almost always damaging. It shall start by teaching your child 'diversity', surely the most important thing? Then they shall go on to teach them history with reference to 'diversity'. 'Diversity' shall be in all and all shall be 'diversity'.

When the family finds it is too poor to survive due to all the crippling and weighty taxes, they shall apply for tax credits and they shall have to write page after page of justification to the tax man as to why they should have the extra few quid a week.

The child shall go to school and 'diversity' shall be the pinnacle of all that he learns. He will be trained to think of Black and ethnic people as his equal, indeed, he will learn of their infinitely higher and more moral wisdom, he shall learn that Africa is the centre of Man (although to him he will be taught Human Beings) He shall learn that religion is a backward fairy tale (excepting all non Christian religions) He shall be taught to laugh at those who have faith in Christ, or are proud of their nation.

He shall learn to despise himself, just as he despises his nation, race and people. He shall be cocooned in the loveless embrace of the state, one from which he will be lucky to escape!

For those unlucky enough to remain within the embrace of the state, shall become more degraded, more desperate, more miserable and in the end all alone!

The state can attempt to be many things, but it can never be your friend, it will never be your family. Amazingly there are many people who seem to think they will always have these state benefits to latch onto, they seem to think it unimportant to love, or have a family or a home, they assume they will find someone in a few years time, always in a few years time until it is too late. Some cite the environment or their pleasure as an excuse not to breed, or as a way of excusing their abortion!

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (as he was at the time) has said the following!

“A Christianity that believes it has no other function than to be completely in tune with the spirit of the times has nothing to say and no meaning to offer. It can abdicate without more ado.”

Yet, the lefties seem to think the opposite of what Ratzinger said, they only tolerate Christianity if it shuts up and keeps it's head down and does not step out of line.

Cardinal Keith O'Brien has stood up against this tyranny, let us hope he does not stand down!

Girl fed to oblivious punters!

2007-05-26T13:45:00.000Z

Sometimes something so depraved comes into the open that it genuinely shocks! This is one of them, one that is not being reported by the MSM, only local press are bothering, the reason is that a 14 year old white school girl was murdered, after having sex with a takeaway guy in an alley, and then cut up and fed to the customers!

Now, if this was a case of an ethnic cut up by a whitey! Oh the rage of the MSM would be hard to contain!

"I KILLED her. . . I was just angry."

Albattikhi, 29, had been having sex with Charlene before she died, the jury was told.

She was one of a number of young white girls who went into alleyways behind restaurants in Blackpool to have sex with the men who worked in the takeaways.

What? little girls going to shag 30 year old men? In some grimy alley? This, my friends is what is becoming of our society. This the result of liberalism, the apathy of those who allow or encourage the young to give away their virginity to some grease ball in a smelly alley way! I wonder, is this what those liberals wanted when they set us blindly in this direction?

Did they want us to drown in the filth of our iniquity? Did they desire the final fall of our culture? Did they want little white girls to act as whores don't even do?

This single sentence is repulsive, little girls having sex with 29 or 30 year men! Where were all those fucking social workers and police when this was happening? Organising housing for some fucker that had just got off the boat? Arresting some white man for 'racially aggravated insults'?

This is the fruition of the liberal 'democratic' state, this is your precious 'freedom', freedom to fuck old men, or little girls in some dirty alleyway, freedom to indulge in every filthy depravity you can envisage!

This is not freedom, this is slavery, to our basest instincts! Our leaders make a fine attempt in talking about defending our freedoms and 'democracy', but in truth, they never even knew what freedom was, true freedom, is to be free from this modern day all pervasive state with its corrupting hand and it's whore money!

True freedom entails taking responsibility for one's self and making one's own way in the world. It means not taking handouts, not screwing any system, it means working hard for one's income, it means not thinking of any government as any thing more then an irritant to be avoided or gotten over. It means taking responsibility for one's offspring and not seeing one's daughter become a hobby whore. It means failing and accepting those failures and not blaming others or society or rich people or 'the government' (although the government can be blamed for much more!)

When Blair talks of freedom he talks of the freedom the indulge in depravity and stupidity, to stuff one's self with amphetamines and alcohol to the point of vomiting, to treat sex as some pastime, enough to make the street whores blush!

This is not freedom, it is hedonism and somehow, dangerously, we have confused the two!

D H Lawrence (known for his homosexuality, even he had a better idea of freedom) writes

"Men are free when they are in a living homeland, not when they are straying and breaking away. Men are free when they are obeying some deep, inward voice of religious belief ... Men are free when they belong to a living, organic, believing community, active in fulfilling some unfulfilled, perhaps unrealized purpose ...Men are not free when they are doing just what they like. The moment you can do just what you like, there is nothing you care about doing ..."

Charlene went missing in November 2003. Her body has never been found.

Prosecutor Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court Albattikhi and others had openly talked about Charlene.

He said: "These people were talking about sex with white girls and there was mention of having sex with Charlene."Albattikhi laughed and said she was kinky and she was very small – the plainest possible indication that he was lying to the police when he said he did not know her.

Do you see the contempt that these Arabs have for us as a race? They screw our women and laugh, they see it as we should see it, an act of aggression! Yet we are so apathetic we don't care, so what if my sister is banging some different guy every night of the week, it is her life, so what is my brother is smoking pot! It's not that dangerous! These are the attitudes of those who don't care, those who have capitulated to the liberal tyranny in this land!

If your sister acts like a whore, she is a whore, if your brother acts like some junkie, he is a junkie!

"He and others present were then laughingly saying that Charlene had gone into the kebabs."

Police targeted Albattikhi, a Jordanian immigrant, and his colleague Mohammed Reveshi, who is originally from Iran, after information from witnesses.

Both had a financial stake in Funny Boyz on Dickson Road. Albattikhi is charged with murder while Reveshi, 50, is charged with helping Albattikhi dispose of Charlene's body.

Both men deny the charges and have told police they never knew the girl.

This is the way we live!

Shame on all of us.

Thank God, Blair is going!

2007-05-18T15:27:00.000Z

But does it mean the beginning of the end of the New Labour project?

Lets hope so!

I always found it odd, that anyone, anywhere could actually like Blair, trust him or think him a decent normal guy! I don't want to blow my own trumpet, but since his election as Labour leader 1994, with his fake smile, hideous wife, jeans and all the other signs of someone who does not take the position of the Queen's prime minister very seriously, I have loathed him and all he stands for!

My prejudice was further entrenched by a book by Leo Mckinstry, a former socialist, who wrote Fit to Govern? in 1996, one year before Blair's landslide victory in 1997.

I told people about Blair, I told them about his lies, the constitutional vandalism he was waiting to unleash, I told them about his europhilia, his stupid, craven crawling to public oppinion!

No one listened!

When he won, I assumed that he wouldn't last, surely now the people would see through this paper cutout of a man?

No, they moaned, but kept on voting for him!

He joined America in bombing another nation, without UN approval, no not Iraq, Serbia, and no one cared!

He sends troops into a failed African state and keeps them there for years, again, no one cares!

He, rapes the constitution of the United Kingdom, with little real response, the glorious and unelected House of Lords, a place that usually is more in step with reality and common sense then the elected House of Commons, was stripped of the old Dukes, Earls, Barons and Marquess', now we are left with a wholly appointed House of Lords (no prizes for guessing who appointed them)

Blair made treason his bedfellow and guide, he wantonly and without recall to our glorious dead, gave away more and more of the ancient liberties of England to those prostitutes in Brussels.

His mistress was the infantile media, he courted it, charmed it and led it any which way he choose, he hoodwinked them and through them many people in this land.

He stood by, and actively participated in the looting of this nation, he took the pensions of the old, he stealthily taxed us, more and more, and then, in two joyous weeks, the people rose up against him and his tyranny, the Fuel Protests of 2000, restored my faith in the people of this land.

But he lied and spinned his way out of that one, infuriatingly, he not only survived, he went on to win the general election of 2001!

His Friends, were liars, adulterers, sodomites, thieves and knaves, they plundered the country, parading their depravity before all to see, they show no shame, no repentance when they are caught, no regret at the damage they have caused, indeed, they claim to have brought a new renaissance to what was a blighted nation!

They have allowed millions of illegals into this country(this is an island, how difficult can it be to secure our borders?) they have allowed these animals to trample over the indigenous people of these islands, they have appeased terrorists at every juncture, seeming to gain pleasure at this appeasement.

This group of sodomites and thieves thinks it quite normal to corrupt and weaken the police forces in this country by accusing them of 'institutional racism' and then to expect that same police force (sorry 'service') to meet a raft of 'targets' to make Britain safe again.

Targets are introduced into the Health Service, Police, Home Office and Immigration. No longer do constables, nurses, civil servants or Immigration officers do their jobs, they fill in forms, justifying their existence to this government of thieves and sodomites!

When targets are not met, the thieves and sodomites change the targets and declare a target achieved, they dumb down exams in schools and with bare faced cheek, they proclaim that children today are better educated then they were even ten or twenty years ago.

This government of knaves and sodomites parades all the failures of the past decade in front of us and declare it a victory! They expect us to celebrate with them, indeed, if we do not celebrate with them, they criminalise us and imprison us in goals filled with immigrant scum, the same scum who came here as refugees and were never deported!

They mock God with their 'gay marriage', they mock us with their failed and ruinous policies.

Anthony Blair did to his credit stand by America after the September 11th attacks in 2001, but even here, he has failed, he has failed to wage war with a lions heart, he has appeased Islam and given it the chance to thrive in this ancient Christian nation.

Thank God he is going, for he has been there far too long, no good came of him, only degredation, and decay.

War with Iran? Pull the other one!

2007-05-17T20:48:00.000Z

I've been reading with interest, over the past few days, some fevered speculation that we are near war with Iran!

The Telegraph ran a headline stating "We must attack Iran before it gets the bomb", this was followed up with assessments of Iran's response, and the growing Iranian nuclear threat.

Front Page Magazine, has a report stating that Iran has "Crossed a Red Line", I get the distinct impression that some are thinking that this is the time to go to war, perhaps to introduce 'democracy to Iran'?

Well, even if the Americans, Israelis or someone in coalition with others (which is highly unlikely) attacks Iran, it will not fall as easily as Iraq, for one main reason, the disastrous policies applied to Iraq since 2003!

I was never one to believe in the whole WMD thing, the 45 minute danger that Blair announced in the House of Commons seemed to me at best an exaggeration, I was shocked people fell for that, but never mind!

I did support the invasion of Iraq, for 2 reasons, the status quo was untenable, we had besieged Iraq for over a decade without any noticeable effect on Saddam or the Ba'athists, we could either go in and get rid of him, or rehabilitate him and let him ship the oil and be a 'good boy', we took the war path, mistakenly many would now say! I also supported it for the reason that we need to secure our future supplies of oil, reserves around the world are being depleted, the Middle East offers the only consistently large supply of oil for the foreseeable future.

But instead of kicking Saddam out and securing another friendly man in power, before leaving, or retreating to our military camps allowing the Iraqi armed forces to deal with the newly formed insurgency, we decide to introduce 'democracy' in to the Middle East.

Not that this is an evil thing, I'm sure some of the men in the White House had visions of flowers and dancing children, tidy towns and cities made in the image of America, except with darker people, mosques instead of churches and funny writing.

But, this dream must surely have been smashed by now? The only reason we should go into another nation is for selfish national reasons, hey if it works out well for the nation being invaded, great! If not, tough!

America and the West should not be in the business of 'helping' other peoples and nations for the sake of being 'nice', the truth is, we are not in that business, but to make our realpolitik look nice and friendly in this sentimental, childish age, our political leaders knowing us to be sentimental, ignorant and childish sign on to this lie, it becomes vital in this 'democratic' age! This is one of the joys of 'democracy', that concept we are told that is the panacea for all the ills of the world!

(If only Zimbabwe, Congo, Nigeria and Iran would introduce democracy, the world would be a beautiful place, oh wait, they do have elections...)

Some actually talk themselves into believing it and I'm sure some do actually believe this 'democracy' crock!

Democracy is an ideology that has outlived its usefulness anyway, it does not even work here in the West, how the hell is it going to work in the Middle East?

This disaster in Iraq must not be repeated, all the reasons (except to resolve the untenable situation re: the sanctions) to go to war in 2003 have been missed, no not missed ruined, Iraq is not producing more oil, it is costing America billions every year, this war has backfired to a huge degree, every bad mistake seems to have been made, and now we are being told we need to go to war with Iran?

Well, if someone else were to do so, then yeah sounds great, but what will the American people think? What will Europe think?

No one will fight! If they do, they will lose just as we've done in Iraq.

Any politician that makes a case for war with Iran whether he is genuine or not, will be under huge pressure by the left, he will be smeared and libeled, and will most probably lose power, hounded out by friends of Islam and those lefties who always love to hound out people they disagree with!

War with Iran? yeah right!

Elections 2007

2007-05-07T15:22:00.000Z

The local English elections have resulted in one gain for the BNP!

That is out if 10,000 local seats throughout the country, not exactly what one would call impressive no matter how the BNP spins it!

What has shocked me, is the amount of people still willing, and seemingly eager to vote for Labour!

I thought everone hated Labour for the 'War'? Or not spending enough on the 'elf service or not allowing in enough immigrants?

But I suppose all those hypocrites always intended to vote Labour anyway. I heard one man on the news say, that he voted Labour, because he has always voted Labour and always will!

What a fucking idiot!

Get an immagination!

So, in brief, nothing much has changed here, except in Scotland, although how much it has changed we shall have to see, as the SNP are chronic lefties themselves.

France has been a bit more interesting, Nicholas Sarkozy is now President elect, who will take over on the 16th May, he has run a good campaign, and a seemingly honest campaign. If he keeps to his word France may be in for a few momentus years ahead!

In America, the whole Presidential race is terminally boring, even the ones I assumed would be of some interest such as Guiliani are conspicious by their invisibility!

What I beleive Britain and America need, is some sort of proportional voting system, it would turn these boring contests into something more exiting, it would also give us more people to vote for without having to waste our votes!

It's Sarko!

2007-05-06T20:48:00.000Z

Nicolas Sarkozy has won a clear mandate for change in France with his decisive victory over Ségolène Royal in the French presidential election. He has campaigned throughout with the slogan of seeking a rupture – a clean break – with the French politics of recent years and on Sunday French voters turned out in remarkable numbers to endorse that message. Torn between the desire for security and realisation of the need for reform, they have opted for reform.

FT.COM

BBC News

AMEROGOD

2007-05-05T22:08:00.000Z

To examine its present trajectory is to discover the state of the American nation irredeemable. The proportion of citizens pickled—like cadavers—in the toxic bromides of multiculturalism is formidable; consequently, the dissolution of the once indivisible American ethos into sects of squabbling ethnicities is all but destined. As for those citizens not so intoxicated, they dwell divided betwixt distraction and despair, in passivity and complacency, awaiting a savior that will never come. And so it is with a hardened heart I hammer out …

AMEROGOD and THE NEW MANIFEST DESTINY

The idea of American Manifest Destiny is not exclusive to the mid-nineteenth century, though the period of imperial "Westward Ho!" is one of the more conspicuous symptoms of that deeper, existential malady—the messianic mission to make the world over in America's image. Not only does this mandate hearken back to the founding of the Republic but, to this very hour, it gallops apace under the banner of global democracy. The crusade to extend salvation across the globe—to make all places not America, America—is matched only by a more recent, penitent reflex to make all places America, un-American. And whereas once American pretensions to empire could bring but shame to the nation for military misadventures or issue punitive slaps to the jingoist’s ego, at home, the uncritical institutionalization of diversity and the aggressive indoctrination of such facile dogmas as "we are a nation of immigrants," must prove even more destructive to the American body politic for they threaten the very existence of the nation itself.

The political knaves and the meretricious mouthpieces of popular culture have spoken: Thou shalt not question immigration—legal or otherwise. "We are a nation of immigrants" goes the benediction and the demons of racism and xenophobia are exorcised back to Dark Ages before the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred nineteen and sixty-five. Talk of immigration reform (except to increase the huddled masses yearning to cannibalize the Middle Class at the behest of their elitist wranglers) is tantamount to heresy; indeed, proposing a moratorium during which to examine the environmental, financial and existential consequences of permitting millions of aliens of questionable political allegiances to populate this country is the most damnable offense of all.

That we are a nation of Americans—and not a nation of immigrants—is an elementary civic fact. (Incidentally, Osama bin Laden’s fatwa was not titled “Declaration of War Against All Immigrants.”) Neither fact nor force of history—until that force is brought to bear—will convince the open-borderites that their World Nation of Babel is a destructive delusion. Nor is such utopian idiocy confined to any one political persuasion. It is touted by dim-bulbs named Bush and bloated Bostonians called Kennedy, America-hating Leftists, their puling liberal lapdogs and laissez faire libertarians alike. Corporatists of the Church of Economic Determinism gorge themselves on cheap labor while Evangelicals from the School of Putting los Anuses en los Asientos lustily pack the pews with the ceaseless supply of commodities, consumers and congregants unlimited immigration provides. If America is prohibited from restricting immigration on the belief that we are a “nation of immigrants,” it warrants consideration that if we are, and always have been so, then prior to the 1965 Immigration Reform and Control Act America was a nation of immigrants—almost exclusively of European origin. This, the reconquistadors of La Cuckaracha Raza aught to ponder when next they march their Mexican flag waiving mestizo minions onto American streets. Clearly, immigration policy should be dictated by some other criteria; if not, then perhaps it isn’t too late to correct a certain historical mistake.

The nation killers assure us that none can escape the dizzying, centripetal spin of the great American assimilation machine. In goes the immigrant, out the American: not the proud citizen reverential of America’s historical exceptionalism, but the malleable sort eager only to consume scows of garbage they don't need or that demands little more from their leisure time than to slobber over the tawdry exploits of Hollywood’s latest loose bimbo. (In the very least, they are sufficiently American to vote Democrat or attend Catholic mass.) This is a cynical estimation, but the only one that matters to our governing elites. That they themselves do not truly accept the acculturation of immigrants into the American national family is betrayed by another indubitable truth they trumpet so loudly: Diversity is our greatest strength.

Our leaders pay lip service to assimilation even as they deny a particular American culture exists; and inasmuch as one does, it is vilified as inherently oppressive—a racist, sexist legacy to be openly rejected by the immigrant and native alike. Worse still, group rights have formally replaced the rights of the individual. The government incentivizes factionalism and rewards minorities for maintaining their cultural exclusivity through generous entitlements and policies of affirmative action. Adding more diversity to the already encouraged-to-be-indignant ethic blocs can only lead to future violent, internecine conflict—a civil war that will tear the country apart at its unnatural seams as the nations-within-nations vie against one another for scarce resources.

Lamentably, the just and the wise do not always prevail. As the rhetorical salvos are lobbed and the ideological artillery discharged, from the carnage of our country a hideous new order is bent on ascendancy. Out of the reconstituted ashes of the nation no phoenix spreads its blazing wings but there hatches a hydra—its multifarious heads and snapping beaks hissing the false praises of diversity. The Shining City on the Hill has been trampled into the ground by the hungry hordes. Liberty Enlightening the World stands not as she once did—as an inspiration—but as an easy harlot of the harbor. The Mother of Exiles has cast aside her shining lamp and, like some pagan fertility goddess, invites the huddled masses of the world to milk the bounteous udders of the State bone dry.

America, home of the new mongrel proletariat has become Amerogod, great welfare state to the world.

Source

28 Weeks Later

2007-05-05T12:34:00.000Z

The first film 28 Days Later scared the shit out of me! Perhaps it was the fact that most of the places shown in the film are places I've shopped in, worked in or walked through? Perhaps is is also the fact that they things portrayed have an awful ring of possibility about them?

Also, if something like this were to happen, our present government are so fucking useless and incompetent, that this is what would be inevitable!

I'm definitely seeing this one!

The Suburbs will explode if Sarkozy wins!

2007-05-04T18:26:00.000Z

An invader Koné Jaoussou stood in a doorway on the infamous Grande Borne council estate, shaking his head at the prospect of a victory for Nicolas Sarkozy in the French presidential election

."If Sarkozy wins this place is going to explode again," said the 28-year-old invader from Mali as he recalled the violence that rocked La Grande Borne in 2005 and again last year.

"There'll be riots here and in the suburbs all over France."

Jaoussou's views are shared widely among the 11,000 people who live on the bleak 1970s estate in Grigny, outside Paris, the home to 52 different nationalities. Many say that the youths, who have come to see Sarkozy as a figure of hate, would greet his election with a fresh round of firebomb attacks on cars, buses and the police.

Similar rumors have been circulating on other troubled suburban estates and senior police officers appear to be taking them seriously.

Privately they say they are preparing for clashes if Sarkozy is elected on May 6. "We have to be ready for these gangs to demonstrate like they do on New Year's Eve," one high ranking officer told Le Figaro, referring to the street battles that have become an annual ritual in the suburbs.

Zair Issa, 18, who is also an invader from Mali, agreed on the likelihood of a violent response to the election of the centre-right candidate as he joined in the conversation with Jaoussou. Wearing dark glasses, a large metal chain and a T-shirt with the words "Ghetto Class" across the chest, he said that the hardline former Interior Minister was viewed as the enemy by youths in France's immigrant communities.

"It's because of him that we get police identity checks all the time," he said. "It's oppressive."

Jean-François Charmand, 38, a painter and decorator with flip-flops on his feet and a cannabis joint in his hand, said that Sarkozy's crackdown on crime had served to unleash police brutality on ethnic minorities. "If Sarkozy's elected it's going to be chaos," he said, fingering a multi-coloured necklace.

"We're going to have even more police coming after the blacks and even less freedom than we do now."

On La Grande Borne estate — where only 44 per cent of adults are in work, cats scavenge on rubbish uncollected on the pavements. A burnt-out car was visible in the car park. And a young woman sat on a table outside one of the council blocks. "Don't talk to her," said a youth standing in a doorway. The teenager — probably a spotter for a gang that pays him to alert drug dealers to the arrival of police — approached menacingly. "Get away," he said.

Jaoussou said that the youth was typical of a generation that had adopted a ghetto mentality. "The young people around here feel rejected and you can understand why," he said. "As far as the French are concerned blacks are fit only to be cleaners and manual workers."

Source

Vote BNP!

2007-04-29T11:58:00.001Z

There are local elections in England and Wales on May 3rd, there are also assembly elections in Scotland and Wales.

If you want anything to change vote for the BNP!

Even if you are uncomfortable with them as a party, or despise where they came from, the truth is, our political elites will not listen to us if we vote Labour or Conservative or Liberal, or Monster Raving Loony Party!

They will only fear us if we dare to vote BNP!

You see, most of the political class are political prostitutes, they will do almost anything to get into power, they will go on the Jonathan Ross Show, they will play soccer (badly) for all to see, they will feign interest in pop groups, they will say they passionately believe in the environment or Africa to get some votes!

Now, I don't really mind that we have political hookers in Parliament, what I do mind is that they seem intent on dismantling this nation and handing over the remains to Europe and/or the minorities, for their share of the loot!

Well, I say we make them work for it for a change! Vote BNP, scare the shit out of them and we might actually get some people in the Conservatives and Labour deciding to actually do something we want!

Go on, give it a try, if enough of us do it, we could send shivers down the spines of our pompous overfed elites!

The Truth about Crunulla

2007-04-28T14:44:00.000Z

Part 1.

Part 2.

Part 3.

Part 4.

Hitler, the god of Political Correctness!

2007-04-26T15:15:00.001Z

By Steve Palese:

As I’ll never tire of repeating, Political Correctness is a religion, i.e. a structured belief system based on faith. A religion need not have a god, although Political Correctness appears to have one. Its god is Hitler, an altogether evil god that is despised by its followers.

In this respect Political Correctness is similar to the Aztec religions whose evil gods had to be appeased with constant human sacrifice. The evil god Hitler needs to be kept at bay with constant discrimination against whites.

The doctrine of Political Correctness measures everything against this god, the evil Adolf Hitler. In this religion, everything that Hitler believed in is evil, and everything that he opposed is good. This belief system condenses to two doctrines:

Non-white minorities are to be worshipped in the morning

The white majority is to be degraded in the evening And is based on this one cardinal faith: Whites are oppressors; therefore whites deserve discrimination and racism to redress the imbalance. This faith is in turn sustained and legitimised by three anti-white racial theories:

1. The Unique History of White Evil theory

2. The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege theory

3. The White Majority Deference theory The Unique History of White Evil Theory This racial theory holds that “whites cannot evade history”.

It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against a group based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual participation or consent (in slavery, holocaust, etc.) and therefore denies innocence as a defence.

The Unearned White Skin-colour Privilege Theory This racial theory holds that “whites are privileged”. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against individuals based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual status or financial condition and therefore denies innocence as a defence. The White Majority Deference Theory This racial theory holds that “majorities must serve minorities”.

It is a racial theory because its discriminatory logic applies exclusively to whites. For example, suggesting the reverse, that white minorities in South Africa or Detroit should have not equal but superior rights is widely considered insane. --- And to keep their evil god Adolf Hitler at bay these religious freakazoids believe they have to keep calling for more and more sacrifice:

Sacrifice your borders! Sacrifice your free speech! Sacrifice your safe neighbourhood! Sacrifice your children’s opportunities! Sacrifice your heritage! Sacrifice! Sacrifice! Sacrifice!

Why?

Because The Evil God Adolf Hitler must be kept at bay!

Sacrifice! Sacrifice! Lest he ARISE and BLOT OUT THE SUN!! and stomp cars with his feet!

And gas Jews with his farts!! Sacrifice! Sacrifice! Sacrifice! Sacrifice! And don’t you dare violate the Great Sacred Truth.

“If you go against your group interests while black you’re an uncle tom, if you do so while white you’re open-minded. Amen. If you express group interests while black you’re standing up for your people, if you do so while white you’re racist. Amen.”

Source: South Africa Sucks

Marx was a Satanist!

2007-04-20T14:37:00.000Z

Well, I dont know if it is true, but it is quite interesting! From the Occidental Crusader

'Though not widely known, Marx was a Satanist. In his student years, Marx authored a little-known drama, Oulanen. Modern Communists and socialists have gone to great lengths to suppress this telling literary creation of the young Marx. Below are some revealing excerpts:

If there is a Something which devours,
I'll leap within it,
though I bring the world to ruins - The world which bulks between me and the abyss
I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
I'll throw my arms around its harsh reality,
Embracing me, the world will dumbly pass away,
And then sink down to utter nothingness,
Perished, with no existence – that would be really living.

Unfortunately, this was not just Marx's portrayal of a demonic character. As we shall see, it is the young man portraying himself. The Romanian expert on Marx, Rev. Richard Wurmbrand, comments:'In Oulanem Marx... consigns the entire human race to damnation. Oulanem is probably the only drama in the world in which all the characters are aware of their own corruption, and flaunt it and celebrate it with conviction. In this drama there is no black and white... Here all are servants of darkness, all reveal aspects of Mephistopheles. All are Satanic, corrupt, doomed.'

God, I hate this guy!

2007-04-18T22:02:00.000Z

David 'call me Dave' Cameron

Virginia shootings, BBC's verdict!

2007-04-18T21:15:00.000Z

The BBC has had it's wet dream come true!

Stupid Americans, 'lax' gun laws, lots of yanks dead!

How to grand stand BBC style: Virginia Shootings

Iran won!

2007-04-10T13:34:00.000Z

John Bolton, the former American Ambassador to the UN has said that 'Iran won' in the recent standoff between Iran and Britain!

I fear he is right!

"If the outcome of the stand-off with Iran was a success for British diplomacy, "one hesitates to ask what would constitute failure," Bolton wrote in the business daily. "

I have to agree with him here, the embarrassing situation into which Britain has been launched has been a disaster from beginning to end!

First we have a navy and armed personnel who do not have the equipment to properly protect themselves, we have a government that regularly dumps upon the military, either using them as an arm of the left wing policies of this state, or alternatively as a scape goat for 'racism' 'sexism' and the other currently unacceptable 'isms' around today!

This government also believes that they can constantly cut the armed forces budgets, whilst committing them to more and more fields of war! How long this can continue is unclear, the effect on morale is already apparent!

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are also deeply unpopular at home, making the fighting of these wars even harder, in this the government is wholly to blame! First they exaggerate the threat posed by Iraq (Something that makes it almost impossible to fight future wars!), then they make blunder after blunder in the administration of Iraq, all the time refusing to fight the leftist defeatism rife in the press, leaving the left to make the case that Iraq was a disaster, and this war of propaganda was lost long ago!

So, in some ways it is understandable why these troops surrendered so readily, why bother risking one's life so recklessly, why risk one's life for a cause no one at home believes in? Why bother fighting when one's political masters treat one with such obvious disdain?

But this is not the disaster of which I write! That came after this litany of incompetence!

Surrender can be acceptable in some circumstances, there are times when being brave is to be wise! The embarrassment was not the surrender, but the manner of their confinement!

The way in which the British captives behaved was a disgrace, mainly to themselves! It is one thing for the government to dump on you or for the press to smear your name or for the PC brigade to attack you for all you do and do not do, that is one thing! No matter how much shit is thrown at you, you still have your honour! This is what those captives gave away whilst in Iran, they gave away their honour!

This is the thing which I believe upsets people, this is what will not be forgotten quickly by the world!

Weakness was shown in Iran, not physical weakness, but moral weakness, these men and woman had no honour, and if they did, they have it no more! By extension neither does Britain!

A French Blog!

2007-04-09T15:33:00.000Z

I have set up a french blog which I have linked to bellow.

This new blog will translate some of my posts here and I may post a few things exclusively in French!

La Défense Occidentale

Shocked and disgusted!

2007-04-07T23:04:00.000Z

Apparently, those fine fellows who surrendered to the Iranian bandits without a fight, who then fully co-operated with their captors in their propaganda, who then thanked their captors when set free, who then gave some pathetic excuse that there was no point in resisting! You remember them? Well, now they are to sell their stories to the papers for tens of thousands of pounds!

So, they wimp out in battle, they indulge their captors and not only get off scott free, but get a handsome reward for it?

Words fail me, these people are little better then the media whores that inhabit the Big Brother houses, these people are so undeserving of any sympathy, it astounds me, do you remember that Italian men, who when told to beg for mercy before they cut off his head refused, tore off his hood and shouted "I will show you how an Italian dies"

Brave, I suppose it is something you are or are not! These armed personnel quite definitely do not have it! Whats the bet half of them convert to Islam within a year?

Well, I suppose you have to have some sort of ability to believe in something to do even that!

These people, who so easily could have been heroes, have in my eyes dishonoured and disgraced themselves, their families and their country, they have failed us, they have failed their Sovereign Lady and now they wish to prostitute themselves for money to the tabloids, with no shame! Even whores have more honour!

Cowards!

2007-04-07T17:38:00.001Z

I have tried not to criticise the marines and sailors involved in the 'crisis', but the more I see and hear, the more outraged I am by their behaviour when in captivity.

I know, you say 'you were not there, you were not in fear of your life', quite true, but I am entitled to my opinion none the less!

The behaviour of the captives has been nothing short of cowardly and treasonous! Faye Turney should not have been there in the first place, but having given into the lesbian feminist brigade, she should not have been so meek, so easily prodded into writing letters and making 'confessions' on TV, and what was she doing wearing that hijab? Cowardice!

Then we had Faye Turney and 2 colleagues 'confess' to entering Iranian territorial waters, they were smiling, as if this was all some jolly joke! Where is that old virtue of pride?

Then they meekly go cap in hand to Ahmedinejad and thank him for their 'holiday'!

Where is their honour? For what did they think they joined the armed forces for, travel opportunities? Work experience?

Treason, dishonour and cowardice!

They should be ashamed of themselves!

These people should not be in the military, they should not be there to humiliate this country and betray its people and their Queen, they deserve to be Court Marshaled and given dishonourable discharges! The sooner the better!

2007-04-07T12:54:00.000Z

To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.

To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished.

It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed, and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonoured.

That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.

Hope for Europe?

2007-04-06T20:07:00.000Z

Ralph Peters of the New York Post, has written an article that I assume was meant to be insulting to Europeans, and inflate liberal American self righteous moral superiority! But it cheered me up no end!

"November 26, 2006 -- A RASH of pop prophets tell us that Muslims in Europe are reproducing so fast and European societies are so weak and listless that, before you know it, the continent will become "Eurabia," with all those topless gals on the Riviera wearing veils.
Well, maybe not."

"The notion that continental Europeans, who are world-champion haters, will let the impoverished Muslim immigrants they confine to ghettos take over their societies and extend the caliphate from the Amalfi Coast to Amsterdam has it exactly wrong."

World class haters? Hmmmm, so the rest of the world live in gardens of Eden, dancing around, with the sounds of laughter in the background, except in nasty ole Europe?

"The endangered species isn't the "peace loving" European lolling in his or her welfare state, but the continent's Muslims immigrants - and their multi-generation descendants - who were foolish enough to imagine that Europeans would share their toys."

And we should share our 'toys' for what reason?

"In fact, Muslims are hardly welcome to pick up the trash on Europe's playgrounds.
Don't let Europe's current round of playing pacifist dress-up fool you: This is the continent that perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing, the happy-go-lucky slice of humanity that brought us such recent hits as the Holocaust and Srebrenica."

Well, yes, these bastards are not liked very much at all, clean up rubbish? They live in filth and wouldn't know how to clean. And this from a guy that lives in the US that ethnically cleansed an entire continent clean of the 'native Indians'?

"THE historical patterns are clear: When Europeans feel sufficiently threatened - even when the threat's concocted nonsense - they don't just react, they over-react with stunning ferocity. One of their more-humane (and frequently employed) techniques has been ethnic cleansing."

So what was the trail of tears? A picnic?

"And Europeans won't even need to re-write "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" with an Islamist theme - real Muslims zealots provide Europe's bigots with all the propaganda they need. Al Qaeda and its wannabe fans are the worst thing that could have happened to Europe's Muslims. Europe hasn't broken free of its historical addictions - we're going to see Europe's history reprised on meth."

History, yes, it is a wonderful thing when one has it!

"The year 1492 wasn't just big for Columbus. It's also when Spain expelled its culturally magnificent Jewish community en masse - to be followed shortly by the Moors, Muslims who had been on the Iberian Peninsula for more than 800 years."

Yeah, these Moors were the remnants of an invader race, outsiders, they had been given a chance to live peaceably in Spain by Ferdinand and Isabella, they broke their oaths and rebelled, what was Spain supposed to do? Invent sink estates and let them form gangs to kill Catholics? Perhaps they could have allowed these rebels to help bring in more Moors from across the Strait of Gibraltar?

"Jews got the boot elsewhere in Europe, too - if they weren't just killed on the spot. When Shakespeare wrote "The Merchant of Venice," it's a safe bet he'd never met a Jew. The Chosen People were long-gone from Jolly Olde England."

Yeah, so what people were expelled from many nations, the US included.

"From the French expulsion of the Huguenots right down to the last century's massive ethnic cleansings, Europeans have never been shy about showing "foreigners and subversives" the door."

Ethnic cleansing that Americans aided and abetted by the way!(remember Silesia, Pomerania, Prussia and the Sudetenland?)

"And Europe's Muslims don't even have roots, by historical standards. For the Europeans, they're just the detritus of colonial history. When Europeans feel sufficiently provoked and threatened - a few serious terrorist attacks could do it - Europe's Muslims will be lucky just to be deported. "

Quite true, I look forward to that day!

"Sound impossible? Have the Europeans become too soft for that sort of thing? Has narcotic socialism destroyed their ability to hate? Is their atheism a prelude to total surrender to faith-intoxicated Muslim jihadis?"

Lets hope not!

"The answer to all of the above questions is a booming "No!" The Europeans have enjoyed a comfy ride for the last 60 years - but the very fact that they don't want it to stop increases their rage and sense of being besieged by Muslim minorities they've long refused to assimilate (and which no longer want to assimilate)."

I don't think we ever wanted them to assimilate, we just want them to go home!

"WE don't need to gloss over the many Muslim acts of barbarism down the centuries to recognize that the Europeans are just better at the extermination process. From the massacre of all Muslims and Jews (and quite a few Eastern Christians) when the Crusaders reached Jerusalem in 1099 to the massacre of all the Jews in Buda (not yet attached to Pest across the Danube) when the "liberating" Habsburg armies retook the citadel at the end of the 17th century, Europeans have just been better organized for genocide."

But of course America has never done this! (Native Indians, Nicaragua, Vietnam, etc...)

"It's the difference between the messy Turkish execution of the Armenian genocide and the industrial efficiency of the Holocaust. Hey, when you love your work, you get good at it."

This just don't make any sense, millions of Indians died quite messily in America!

"Far from enjoying the prospect of taking over Europe by having babies, Europe's Muslims are living on borrowed time. When a third of French voters have demonstrated their willingness to vote for Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front - a party that makes the Ku Klux Klan seem like Human Rights Watch - all predictions of Europe going gently into that good night are surreal."

People vote for Le Pen because they are pissed off that our leaders ignore what we want, they are imposing this immigration on us!

"I have no difficulty imagining a scenario in which U.S. Navy ships are at anchor and U.S. Marines have gone ashore at Brest, Bremerhaven or Bari to guarantee the safe evacuation of Europe's Muslims."

Yeah, that would be funny, personally, I think you would be fools to take them, but you are welcome to them

"After all, we were the only ones to do anything about the slaughter of Muslims in the Balkans."

It was going so well till you Yanks interfered!

"And even though we botched it, our effort in Iraq was meant to give the Middle East's Muslims a last chance to escape their self-inflicted misery."

N0, you did that to ensure your oil supplies (Not that I mind, but please stop pretending it was for their good)

"AND we're lucky. The United States attracts the quality."

Well, if that's how you want to describe them, go ahead!

"American Muslims have a higher income level than our national average. We hear about the handful of rabble-rousers, but more of our fellow Americans who happen to be Muslims are doctors, professors and entrepreneurs."

???

"And the American dream is still alive and well, thanks: Even the newest taxi driver stumbling over his English grammar knows he can truly become an American."

Well its your national suicide!

"But European Muslims can't become French or Dutch or Italian or German. Even if they qualify for a passport, they remain second-class citizens. On a good day. And they're supposed to take over the continent that's exported more death than any other?"

This is why I'm becoming more hopeful for Europe, we have definite identities, that's why I also fear for America, as it does not have any identity any more, just idiots like this!

"All the copy-cat predictions of a Muslim takeover of Europe not only ignore history and Europe's ineradicable viciousness, but do a serious disservice by exacerbating fear and hatred. And when it comes to hatred, trust me: The Europeans don't need our help."

So, wanting to keep your country alive, wanting your children to inherit your nation without the stain of these fuckers on it is 'hatred'? Well then, I am steeped in it!

"The jobless and hopeless kids in the suburbs may burn a couple of cars, but we'll always have Paris."

What an insightful fellow! It is morons like this that give America a bad name! In his self righteous ignorance he assumes America is this paradise on earth, a city on a hill?

America is a nation like any other, you massacred Indians, did some dodgy things in Central America, Vietnam, etc...you 'stole half of Mexico, you 'illegally' overthrew the Hawaiian Queen and annexed this pacific Kingdom, you imposed yourselves on others, invaded lands to protect your vital interests, but stop fooling yourselves, this was not to 'free' anyone, it was for your own good, this is what nations do!

All countries do things that are unseemly, this is what power is about, to take the posturing stance of the above article is childish and dangerous, America is in danger precisely because so many Americans have fallen for this 'America is unique' bull shit, you cant take in half the world and think you will look the same or be anything like the same after the event! If 100 million Muslims were to immigrate to America in the next 10 years, America would no longer be the America you know, in 100 years it would be gone, perhaps the name would remain, but the people would be different, the way of life would be different, it would no longer be America!

It is really beginning to infuriate me, there are too many in that nation that think the rules do not apply to them, there are some like Ralph Peters, who think the rules don't apply at all, and we in Europe are 'haters' because we object to these rude, offensive outsiders taking what is ours and telling us to conform to them!

This is called reacting in a normal manner, what is abnormal is when you encourage people to come and take what is yours, to demand you accept them and their ways, this is abnormal, even suicidal, if America does not find some common sense soon enough, then I fear America will become a hodge podge of opposing ethnicities vying for land, money and opportunity.

America worked because they once only accepted, dare I say it, white Christian immigrants, that is the reason for the previous success of immigration to America, it is the only reason!

Whats wrong with Britain?

2007-04-01T11:11:00.000Z

Even though an act of war has been carried out against this nation, even though 15 of our people are being held hostage and paraded on TV, this country seems not to care in the slightest!

It is a very strange place to be, I was sure that this would dominate the press like the Ken Bigley affair did a few years ago. No, we get our knickers in a twist over some guy who voluntarily goes to work in Iraq, get kidnapped and finally killed, but when our military are seized by an enemy state and threatened with a show trial, we shrug our shoulders and say, 'ah well', why? Whats wrong with this country? 100 years ago, if this had happened we would be sending off a naval task force with thousands of men to teach the enemy a 'well deserved lesson', what, have we gone weak, or just plain stupid?

And now, that dim bitch Patricia Hewitt, has this to say about the crisis:

"It was deplorable that the woman hostage should be shown smoking. This sends completely the wrong message to our young people."

Can't this cunt grow up for just 5 minutes? Cant she try to look at the woods rather then the trees? What a thick, ignorant, small minded bitch!

What is with the BBC?

2007-03-30T23:11:00.000Z

In this hostage crisis, the BBC is proving itself to be a crucial ally of the Iranian regime.

Apparently the BBC used to be an organisation that helped it's own people in wars and such, in the second world war, the BBC reported as accurately as was possible without compromising national security, and also saw itself as 'British'!

Well, that was the past, now the BBC is I am sure shaming the Iranian state broadcaster in its grovelling to Ahmedinejad and the Mullahs in Tehran, See the following items taken from the BBC website:

1. Second sailor 'apologises' to Iran, now, although they put the apologises in quotation marks, they never in the story show any support for the hostages and take it at face value that they are apologising, they also in their broadcasts seem to be going out of their way to tell their viewers that the 'detained men' as they so quaintly put it are being treated very well by the Iranians and seem to spend little time in explaining that these men were not in Iranian waters leaving the viewer with the impression that these men were in fact in Iranian waters.

2. Britain and Iran raise the stakes. Typical BBC 'neutrality' here, so it's both Britain and Iran the are raising the stakes is it? It's not the Iranians who are to blame is it? Well, the BBC seems to think that would be a value judgement too far, although the BBC were quick to condemn Bush for the 'Katrina disaster' in New Orleans and Rumsfeld of the 'torture' of Abu Ghraib. Odd they condemn the West and let the Ayatollahs off scott free?

But this is only part of the trend at the BBC, they no longer see themselves as British, they belong to the 'world', I'm sure they would love to rename themselves the GBC (Global Broadcasting Corporation) as they show more loyalty to various third world despots then they do to the nation that pays for them through their Licence Tax!

Bastards!

Weakness will be remembered!

2007-03-30T13:19:00.000Z

15 British Royal Marines and sailors have been seized by Iranian 'pirates', the marines and sailors, don't fight, reasons unknown, but it is thought that the stringent rules of combat that have been dumped on servicemen in the area prevented them from fighting the Iranians so as 'not to heighten tension'.

Simply put our exalted leaders left these marines and sailors out on a limb, and not their own!

What was the response of the British armed forces? They did nothing. They could easily have persued the Iranians and rescued the men, but they stayed put and did nothing.

Tony Blair, the Queen's failed prime minister, couldn't find time to say anything about this for 3 days! Then he comes out and mouths some platitude about this being 'wrong'.

Forgive me, but does this government have any fucking clue about what it's supposed to be doing? Sorry they are too busy legalising more sexual perversions, super casinos and drugs, very important work that!

All these ministers from the prime down, are a shower of complete fucking idiots, not fit to run a market stall, and here they are making fools out of themselves again!

Well considering they failed to properly support our troops, then failed to order their rescue when that was possible, it has now become impossible to rescue them barring an invasion of that dark place.

Do we imagine that Blair with only a few more weeks could, even if he wanted (which I doubt) order an aggressive act against Iran to rescue these men?

What a fucking idiot, the sooner he goes, the better!

Unfortunately for the rest of us, national weakness/incompetence will be remembered long after he has left office!

Lady of the Sea, Seth Lakeman

2007-03-21T23:04:00.000Z

Europe, Not as bad as you think!

2007-03-21T18:34:00.000Z

Something that I have noticed over the past few months is, I believe a misguided contempt of Europe and Europeans on the American 'blogosphere'.

I can understand it quite well, our leaders are contemptable snivelling cowards, but are American leaders any better?

European economies are slow growing or shrinking, quite true, socialism has been ingrained into Europe's economy, retarding it's growth! But, forgive me for pointing out that America, although growing faster then Europe on the whole is not growing as fast as Ireland, Switzerland or some East European economies, the reason for the 'low' growth of the 'European economy' is France, Italy and Germany, take them out, we are growing as fast as America, if not faster!

There are many sneering references to out of control immigration to Europe, quite true, immigration is out of control, our treasonous leaders have ensured this! But America has accepted more immigrants in the past decade then all of Europe combined! And America has 300 million people, Europe has 800 million! Also, Europeans, from what I have deduced from talking with them do not accept these people as French or Italian or English or Irish or Spanish etc... Americans seem to conclude that if someone (no matter how despicable or criminal they are) stays in America for a number of years, then they are American! You see it matters not if an Arab or an African has a French or British passport, they will never be French or British. If those same people go to America, they are as American as the descendants of the Pilgrims, or the Scotch-Irish or the Germans or Huguenots! That is not something to be proud of!

The European Union, is contemptible, invented by atheists who hate the 'true Europe', they wish to see the end of Europe and the European peoples. But they are not 'us', they are 'our' enemies! I certainly would love to see the end of the EU, it could be replaced by a free trade zone, something most Europeans would support.

Although there is much anti-Americanism, something I find childish in it's blatant but unrecognised jealousy, not all people want to be American! Some American bloggers write as if it is unthinkable that any right thinking person would not wish to be American. As much as I admire America and its constitution, it tradition of decency etc... I also do not wish to be American! I am part of a different tradition, if I was to immigrate it would be to Australia or Canada or New Zealand, nations with similar and shared histories, from their settlements to today... I understand the desire of the Italians and the French and the Germans to maintain their separateness, after all they also have great civilisations, they don't need to learn English or be just like us, if they did the world would become a greyer place.

Most Europeans that I have met on my many travels throughout the continent are decent, educated and civilised people. Opposed to the waves of immigration as much as any other sensible person. There is of course anti-Americanism, I assure you I have argued against them many times, but there are also people who, although are not anti-American do actively dislike McDonald's, Starbucks and the other chain stores from over the pond, this may seem anti-Capitalist to some, but when you are standing in the Piazza da San Marco in Venice or the ramparts of Alghero in Sardinia, or before the Grossmunster in Zurich or standing on one of Lisbon's seven hills taking in the view, you can kinda see their point! The idea of some chain store does seem like vandalism! It may be ok in a city 100 years old, but these places are mellenia old, they are living places not some discardable throw away thing, or some plastic Disney World castle, these is the real things!

I know that there is an ideology of American exceptionalism, America is a great nation, it is not exceptional, it is not immune to the currents of history or reality. The myth of the enrichment of immigration is an especially dangerous one that is part of the American narrative, one that both the right and left accept and harp on about. Anti-Immigration just does not work, because you think anyone and everyone is potentially American, this is so untrue as to be something I believe may end America as a great power, you cannot ever throw many races together and think they will become one, or that they will accept the morals and standards of the Pilgrims or the 'founding fathers', they wont! On this I believe Europe is stronger, our nations are based on an ethnic identity, immigration for us is very obviously an attack on us, as 'us' is determined by our shared ethnicity and history.

It is strange that Australia, another great immigrant society does not have as part of its national ideology, the idea that all immigration is great! But then Australia had until 30 years ago the unofficial 'White Australia policy', which originally would only allow Britons and Nordic types in. This was extended after 1945 to allow Italians, Greeks, Portuguese and Slavs. This attitude seems healthier to me, it keeps the nation relatively homogeneous. To much difference can be a danger.

I digress! Simply put, I appeal to our American cousins to realise that we are generally quite a sensible bunch, we have our weirdos like you, we also have our challenges like you! But we are not suddenly less then you, because we are not you!

Europe decideds to turn off the lights!

2007-03-13T01:49:00.000Z

When I heard that our much beloved leaders decided to ban normal light bulbs, I didn't really care! I got some 'eco friendly' light bulbs ( the local council were giving them away free a few years ago! Yeah it's a socialist council!) So little harm there, just some more backslapping among those well fed men in Brussels!

Well, I was wrong, apparently, their decision, welcomed as 'too little too late' by the green lobby was a mistake, one that is only now being shown for the idiocy that it was!

Can you imagine, they can't even decide this! A fucking light bulb?

Over at EU Referendum, they have a great post on why this is just so supremely stupid!

"because (the new fancy 'eco friendly bulbs') must be kept on so much longer to run efficiently, the actual amount of energy saved by these bulbs has been vastly exaggerated."

He then goes on to say:

"Because they do not produce light in a steady stream, like an incandescent bulb, but flicker 50 times a second, some who use them for reading eventually find their eyes beginning to swim – and they can make fast-moving machine parts look stationary, posing a serious safety problem – the so-called "strobe effect"...

Fluorescent CFLs cannot be used with dimmer switches or electronically-triggered security lights, so these will become a thing of the past. They cannot be used in microwaves, ovens or freezers, because these are either too hot or too cold for them to function (at any temperature above 50C or lower than –18C they don't work)...

And that is not by any means the full extent of the limitations. CFL's cannot be used for security lights, triggered by photo-electric cells, they cannot be used with timers or dimmers and even use in recessed fittings can dramatically shorten their lives...

In addition to this, low-energy bulbs are much more complex to make than standard bulbs, requiring up to ten times as much energy to manufacture. Unlike standard bulbs, they use toxic materials, including mercury vapour, which the EU itself last year banned from landfill sites – which means that recycling the bulbs will itself create an enormously expensive problem...

Perhaps most significantly of all, however, to run CFLs economically they must be kept on more or less continuously. The more they are turned on and off, the shorter becomes their life, creating a fundamental paradox...

If people continue switching their lights on and off when needed, as Mr Elliott puts it, they will find that their "green" bulbs have a much shorter life than promised, thus triggering a consumer backlash from those who think they have been fooled. But if they keep their lights on all the time to maximise their life, CFLs can end up using almost as much electricity from power stations (creating CO2 emissions) as incandescent bulbs – thus cancelling out their one supposed advantage.

It is unbelievable, even a fucking light bulb they can't right! Why do we in Europe continue to vote for these fucking idiots?

Will America vote itself out of existence?

2007-02-26T14:15:00.001Z

I thought our elites over here in Eutopia were cretinous enough, but apparently we are not alone!

The United States Congress will soon begin to debate a new immigration bill, called an 'amnesty' by some, which would ethnically and culturally transform America within a few decades!

Anepigone writes: 'Americans have too much earning power, think too critically, and expect too much rectitude from the leaders they elect. Replacing them with a more malleable, impoverished population that accepts a certain level of corruption as natural is a solution the executive and much of the legislative agree on:

Senators and lobbyists are putting the final touches on a comprehensive immigration-reform bill that includes an easier citizenship path for illegal aliens and weaker enforcement provisions than were in the highly criticized legislation that the Senate approved last year.'

This is I beleive what most world leaders want, they like the whole power trip thing, they love lording it over us, they want to remain in power, but dictatorship a la Stalin, is just so last century!

Today our leaders need to 'commit' themselves to the 'democratic process' and this is their downfall! We don't like scumbags or thieves running government!

Oh what to do, what to do? Should we be more honest? More reliable? More realistic? Naaah, lets be really brainy, lets invite third world animals into our country, big business will support us because they get cheap labour, the left will applaud it because they are made to hate themselves and to take pleasure in the replacement of their own culture. The others (read you and me, normal people) well they will keep quiet because we will have 'hate laws' in place preventing people from having negative opinions about the third world barbarians or the government policy that invited said barbarians to come here in the first place!

Everyone in a position of power is made to swear fealty to this new ideology, judges, police men, soldiers, doctors, nurses, teachers, the entire entertainment industry(to be fair they were always inclined to this sort of thinking anyway, shallow bastards that they are) Anyone who speaks out in opposition to the new ideology is smeared in the press, humiliated publically if not actually arrested and given a show trial (such as the Nick Griffin case here in the UK last year)

The great thing about the third world savages is that they vote for these slimy corrupt bastards whatever the circumstances. This is one reason why Labour has managed to stay in power over here, this is why Leftists are so powerful in France and Spain and the Netherlands and Belgium!

"In its original conception, the CIRA would've possibly allowed more than 200 million legal migrants into the US, most as 'temporary' workers (Orwellian speak for permanent peasants)."

This is unbelievable, the American elites are as lost as ours are! Can you imagine the sort of hellish world these people would create if not stopped?

I dearly hope America stops this, just as I hope Europe awakes once again, both of us are in trouble, both of us need to clear out the rubbish that has collected all about us in our slumber, we need to chase out the traitors that rule us and threaten us and steal (tax) from us!

Revolution may be necessary, it may be the only way to rid ourselves of the scum at the top and the bottom!

Vive La Guillotine!

Time Magazine!

2007-02-22T08:14:00.000Z

This morning I had the pleasure of catching the headline on Time's European edition, It read 'Getting Along - The many faces of Europe'!

There were six people pictured, one was a Black African male, another was a Chinese man, yet another an Indian Woman in Hindu garb, another woman (I presume it is a woman, may just be a terrorist fleeing the country!) In a burqa and then as a sop to us whiteys there is one white man and one white woman!

Now, apparently the population of Europe is about 800 millions give or take a few million and thats if one considers Russia as part of Europe! There are about 25 millions to 35 million 'ethnics' not two thirds as this picture implies!

Having my curiosity aroused, I have gone onto Time's website to read what I could not bring myself to do earlier, I read the article! Oh my God!

The opener is great!

Two middle-aged women wearing hijabs chat to each other in Arabic as they walk down the street. Ahead of them is a Muslim bookstore, displaying DVDs by imams and books with titles like Scientific Miracles in the Koran. On one corner there's a halal butcher shop; around another, a music store that sells only Arab music. Someone has plastered posters advertising a concert by the Moroccan musician Daoudi. But this isn't Morocco. This is France.
One is inspired by the richness of the other culture, is one not?

The writer, a Mr Jamana Farouky (I may be over reacting, or perhaps I'm just a racist, Islamophobic, xenophobe, but this guy sounds suspiciously like a Muslim) then sets out 5 things that Europe needs to do to integrate it's 'ethnics'

1. Save the veils

Yes apparently we should embrace this sign of Mohammedan oppression as 'European'?

Mr Farouky goes on to write 'European governments need to recognize that Islam — like all religions — is an integral part of the European identity'

I will stop you there Mr Farouky, Islam has never been European, it has always been at odds with Europe, it has always been a tyrant to us, a conquerer, an invader, a foreign thing. Hinduism, Budhism, Taoism, Jainism et al, were unknown to us for mellenia, Judaism, although having birthed Christianity was known by us, but has also never been completely European, Christianity and the pre Christian pagan religions are the only religions native to us, do not, Mr Farouky, presume to tell us who we are!

2. Get a Better View From the Top

Translate this as give more government jobs to foreigners!

"Political parties may need to use what people might consider unorthodox methods to accelerate their own integration," says Trevor Phillips, head of Britain's Commission for Equality and Human Rights. "They might try to ensure they have proportionate regional representation in their candidates. Or they might say that every candidate short list has to have at least one person who isn't white on it. You can't force people onto constituencies, but you can compel parties to think about their responsibilities."

This is my county, not some fucking Arab's or some fucking African who just got off the boat, this is my country, and I will not allow these foreign fucks to rule over me or mine!

3. Push People Up

'The biggest source of conflict in a multicultural society isn't segregation, race or religion — it's money.'

Here we get to the reality of this fucking Muslim's argument, he wants my money, he wants me to pay even more taxes so he and his 'people', those lazy fucking Arabs can sit on their arses all day doing fuck all whilst spending my money and trying to fuck white women.

Well, I have news for this piece of Islamic pig shit, go fuck yourself, or if you prefer your son or your daughter, go fuck off to that hole you crawled out of and stop fucking me off, you saw what the Serbs did to the Muslims in the Balkans? Well, Mr Farouky, the Serbs are true Europeans, they were only stopped because some fucking dozy liberal fuck stopped them (Clinton), the Americans can't stop all of Europe from 'cleansing itself' some time in the future!

4. Make Immigration Smarter

Here he argues we should import some smart immigrants, surely this is an oxymoron! They are all as thick as pig shit as far as I can tell, some of them may have a 'degree' of some sort from the University of Lagos or the Polytechnic of Lusaka, but I somehow doubt that that means very much!

I have a better plan, deport the fuckers!

5. Think Locally, Act Locally

"Integration means building common ground rules on civility, and this happens on the local level. Cohesion is all about everyday interactions, in the supermarket or on the playground."
Yeah, he's rights there, every time I see them arguing in the supermarkets, my contempt for them grows, every time I see them leering at white women, my disgust for them expands, every time I see them I feel sick!

"Successful, long-lasting integration takes place in community clubs and children's play groups, bake sales and block parties. Programs don't have to be big or expensive; Kotler says Education Bradford runs its twinning scheme "on a shoestring." "This isn't woolly liberal multiculturalism," she says. "Yes, it's about respecting difference, but it's also about discovering what it means to live together and feeling O.K. with a sense of multiple identity." Because the only way for Europe to get over its identity crisis is to get used to the idea that there isn't just one."
Well, thats true! We have English, Welsh, French, German, Swiss, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Serb, Greek, Czech, Swedish etc..., many forms of European, not just one!

However methinks she meant something different from my understanding of this!

This article seems an accurate description of our elites view of the world, this will be there undoing, they are traitors who have sold us down the river, no one is confused about their identity except those communist fucks at the top who some day I will enjoy beheading in Parliament Square!

Global warming hysteria!

2007-02-13T11:37:00.000Z

From Al Fin

“The track record of any kind of long-distance prediction is really bad, but everyone’s still really interested in it. It’s sort of a way of picturing the future. But we can’t make long-term predictions of the economy, and we can’t make long-term predictions of the climate,” Dr. Orrell said in an interview. After all, he said, scientists cannot even write the equation of a cloud, let alone make a workable model of the climate.

Formerly of University College London, Dr. Orrell is best known among scientists for arguing that the failures of weather forecasting are not due to chaotic effects — as in the butterfly that causes the hurricane — but to errors of modelling. He sees the same problems in the predictions of the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which he calls “extremely vague,” and says there is no scientific reason to think the climate is more predictable than the weather.

“Models will cheerfully boil away all the water in the oceans or cover the world in ice, even with pre-industrial levels of Co2,” he writes in Apollo’s Arrow . And so scientists use theoretical concepts like “flux adjustments” to make the models agree with reality. When models about the future climate are in agreement, “it says more about the self-regulating group psychology of the modelling community than it does about global warming and the economy.
Source.

Wassily Leontief, Nobel prize winner for modeling, said this about the limits of models. "We move from more or less plausible but really arbitrary assumptions, to elegantly demonstrated but irrelevant conclusions." Exactly. Assume continued warming as in the last three decades, and you get a warming disaster. Assume more episodes of global cooling, and you get a cooling disaster.

...the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.

The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.

Source

The Koran, source of terror!

2007-02-13T01:02:00.000Z

Be quick, I hear youtube's new owner's at google are stamping down on this sort of thing!

Are you serious!

2007-02-13T00:20:00.000Z

I am disturbed, when Barrack (shithead) Obama declared his interest in running for the presidency, I asssumed it was just his overly zealous ego, that saw himself as president, but he seems to be genuinely popular in America!

Are you guys serious! Hillary would be a safer more sane bet then this anti-American, half caste, Islamic apostate, who knows no real loyalty to you! He is half African, was educated in a madrasah in Indonesia, had a Muslim step father and quelle suprise is anti-war!

I really hope that this is only some passing fad, because if he did end up in the White House, America would no longer even be capable of trying to be serious.

Howard slams Obama!

2007-02-12T20:36:00.000Z

John Howard the brilliant Prime Minister of Australia, who has been in power since 1996 and has won 5 general elections has slammed that pathetic excuse for a Senator Barack Obama.

"If I was running al-Qa'ida in Iraq I would put a circle around March 2008 and pray as many times as possible for a victory, not only for Obama, but also for the Democrats," Mr Howard said on Sunday, referring to Senator Obama's plan to pull US troops out of Iraq by March next year.

He was critisised by his 5 time losers, the Labor opposition for 'interfering' with internal potitics of the US! Bloody cheek of those lefty morons, as Howard so eloquently puts it.

"If I hear a policy being advocated that is contrary to Australia's security interests I will criticise it,"

"I don't apologise for criticising Senator Obama's observation because I thought what he said was wrong," he said, accusing the Labor leader of "double standards".

"Apparently it is in order for any number of people in the Labor Party to regularly attack George Bush, to regularly attack the American administration,"

"That is OK, but dare anybody criticise somebody who might agree with them on Iraq and then somehow or other I am interfering in the domestic politics of the United States."

God, I love Howard! He is the sort of guy I would like to have as leader of the government of my country! He has balls and is not affraid to say what he means!

Unfortunatly he is currently behind in the polls, but, he has been behind in the polls before every election in the past and has ended up winning!

Lets hope Johnny baby can do it once more!

2007-02-12T17:33:00.000Z

Muslims at it again!

2007-02-10T23:25:00.000Z

British police prevent a Muslim from having his head cut off by Islamic extremists. Thats good right?

Ah, not quite!

Apparently, this is part of a campaign against Islam!

How is that?

"The Islamic bookshop raided yesterday has been at the centre of controversy for seven years.

The Maktabah store has been raided three times under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. It has links with several past and present terror suspects including Moazzam Begg, who was held in Guantanamo Bay, and Dhiren Barot, 34, jailed for 40 years last November for planning attacks and said to be Osama bin Laden's "UK general".

Maktabah, Arabic for library, is in Sparkhill and sells DVDs of bin Laden as well as books calling on British Muslims to rise up against the West. Titles include 21st Century Crusaders: A War On Muslims In Iraq And Palestine and Heroes of Islam."

And it's still open!

Well, a local had this to say "Mr Khan has run it for five years and was never any trouble."

The Irish, God love 'em!

2007-01-17T03:15:00.000Z

The Irish do not lend themselves to psychoanalysis
-- S. Freud

Bono is at a U2 concert in Ireland when he asks the audience for quiet.
Then in the silence, he starts to slowly clap his hands.

Holding the audience in total silence, he says into the microphone...
"Everytime I clap me hands, a child in Africa dies."

In the silence that follows, a loud voice from near the front of the
audience pierces the quiet...

"So stop clappin your fuckin hands then!"

The Best Dictionary Definitions of Politically Correct Leftist Terms!

2007-01-15T23:16:00.000Z

[Awesome stuff!! I got these from the owner of the "World Threats" website. These are flipping brilliant! Check out some of the entries below. They are hillarious, brilliant and TOTALLY CORRECT! Among my favourites are, for example:

TORTURE (v.)- 1. To hold terrorists and/or criminals in conditions inferior to that of a hotel; 2) to throw a koran in the toilet.

AWARENESS (n.)- 1. Money. Usually in connection with a left-wing cause. Ex- "We are holding this concert to raise AIDS awareness" trans. "We are holding this concert to raise money". Ex- "Join our group and help spread awareness about the plight of the prisoners of Guantanimo Bay" trans. "Join our group and give us money so we can continue attacking America and Bush"; 2. Favorable and disproportionate media coverage. Ex- "City officals have desperately attempted to spread awareness about the threat of Bird Flu" trans. "City politicians have desperately attempted to get their faces on the evening news by frightening the public with the illusory threat of a Bird Flu epidemic so that voters can connect them with 'protection' and 'security' when election time comes".

CONTROVERSIAL (adj.)- Bad. Disliked. Malignant. Most often used in the news media to describe any person, concept, or thing that runs afoul of left-wing orthodoxy. Ex- "Congress is set to vote on a controversial new tax-cutting proposal today, which will likely cut funding to schools by over 30%" trans. "Conservatives in congress have come up with an evil, malignant new tax cutting plan that will make the rich richer by robbing our children of their education".

DIVERSE (adj.)- Having a significant percentage of people who are not of European descent and/or are not heterosexual. Ex- "This party is very diverse!" trans. "This party has a relatively large proportion of black skinned, Muslim, Hispanic, east Asian, and/or gay people". Note that 'diverse' usually does not apply to gender. A party with an equal amount of Irish men and women is not diverse. Cf. leftspeak 'Diversity', where gender is considered.

DIVERSITY (n.)- A skin-color based quota. Sometimes expanded to include gender and/or sexual orientation. Ex- "Solomon Smith Barney is committed to diversity in the workplace" trans. "Solomon Smith Barney uses a skin color based quota when hiring new applicants". Ex- "This college lacks gender diversity" trans. "This college has too many men and thus requires a quota to admit more women".

EMPOWER (v.)- To put into practice a left-wing social engineering and/or brainwashing project. Ex- "The young latina women of P.S. 185 were empowered today to stand up for reproductive rights" trans. "Poor inner-city girls were taught by their teachers today that abortion is a good, responsible, and acceptable course of action if they become pregnant". Ex- "Our goal is to empower women to achieve true diversity in today's boardrooms" trans. "Our goal is to enact a gender based quota to make sure that there are at least 50% women in boardrooms, regardless of their qualifications". See also Empowerment.

FASCIST (n., adj.)- 1. anyone who openly and blatantly opposes left-wing dogma; 2. A practicing Christian; 3. A Jew in favor of Israel's right to exist; 4. A member of the armed forces; 5. Anyone who supports the use of military force in any instance for any reason.

FREE SPEECH (n.) a/k/a 'Freedom of Speech'- 1. Expression that agrees with and/or promotes left-wing dogma in public, whether through public speaking, music, movies, television, or in the news media. Ex- "We applaud Michael Moore for his commitment to Free Speech, but we find Mel Gibson's hateful movies to be offensive"; 2. Expression that is carefully crafted as to not offend non-Christians or anyone who is of non-European descent. Ex- "Art featuring dog poo smeared on the Virgin Mary is valuable free speech. A cartoon drawing of Muhammed is just plain hate speech". Ant. Leftspeak 'Hate Speech'.

HATE CRIME (n.)- any crime committed by a Christian or person of European descent upon a non-Christian or a person of non-European descent.

HATE SPEECH (n.)- 1. Expression that disagrees with and/or challenges left-wing dogma. Ex- "Ann Coulter's book should be banned because we should not allow people to profit off of hate speech in New Jersey"; 2. Speech that could offend non-Christians or anyone of non-European descent. Ant. Leftspeak 'Free Speech'. See also: Leftspeak 'Hateful' (adj.)

IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS (n.)- Unfettered amnesty for illegal immigrants. Ex- "As the senior senator from Massachusetts, I feel I must take a stand to protect immigrants' rights" trans. "I, Ted Kennedy, support amnesty for illegal immigrants because I believe they will all vote for democrats".

INSENSITIVITY (n.)- 1. Expression that unknowingly or unwittingly 1) could offend non-Christians or anyone of non-European descent; OR 2) defies left-wing dogma. Cf. Leftspeak 'Intolerance' and/or 'Hate Speech', where the act of defiance is deliberate. Ex.- "Nike's ad featuring the Cross of St. George painted upon the body of soccer star Wayne Rooney is insensitive because it could be construed by some as a reference to the Crusades which is offensive to muslims".

INTOLERANCE (n.)- Deliberate refusal to alter one's beliefs to comply with leftist sensibilities. Intolerance may include the belief that: 1) Homosexuality is wrong; or 2) People who mutilate their own genitals are insane; or 3) Socialism doesn't work; or 4) Islam is violent; or 5) The bible is true; or 6) the Catholic Church is correct in regard to any issue; or 7) Black people are the major source of their own problems; or 8) One should speak English in the United States; or 9) Christmas trees are not offensive to non-Christians. Cf. Leftspeak 'Hate Speech', which is simply 'intolerance' put into the spoken or written form.

LIBERAL (n., adj.)- 1. A Marxist, communist, or socialist (n.); 2. Inspired by Marxism, communism, or socialism (adj.); This word was co-opted from its original English meaning when the labels 'Marxist', 'communist', and 'socialist' developed deeply unpopular connotations with the general public during the second half of the 20th century. Cf. with the old Eng. 'liberal' (in the political sense), meaning one who supports the free market, private property, protection from government intervention, free speech, and minimal taxes. An anti-royalist libertarian. The founding fathers of the United States were considered 'liberal', in the old sense of the word.

MULTICULTURAL (adj.)- Multiracial. Leftspeak often confuses the concepts of 'culture' and 'race'. Not to be confused with the mod. Eng. 'multicultural', literally meaning "of many cultures". Syn. Leftspeak 'Diverse'.

MULTICULTURALISM (n.)- 1. The ideology that any person, place, thing, or concept related to the Western tradition is inferior to any person, place, thing, or concept related to any non-Western tradition; 2. The systematic subversion of Western Culture and Civilization though the media, schools, and the university system.

PROGRESSIVE (n., adj.)- 1. A Marxist, communist, or socialist (n.); 2. Inspired by Marxism, communism, or socialism (adj.) Syn. Leftspeak 'Liberal'. When the word 'liberal' began to become to closely connected with Marxism and socialism (and thus became unpopular among the public) during the late 1980s and 1990s, many 'liberals' abandoned that label in favor of 'progressive', which derives from the English word 'Progress', meaning to forge ahead. Cf. mod. Eng. 'Regress' (v.), meaning to go back or revert to an old form or way- perhaps a more apt description.

QUAGMIRE (n.)- Any military operation: 1) involving ground troops; OR 2) lasting over one week in duration; OR 3) resulting in over 20 casualties.

REDISTRIBUTE (v.)- To tax and spend, usually upon a bloated social program or welfare system. Ex- "The democratic party strongly supports the redistribution of resources so that everyone can have a chance at the American dream" trans. "The democratic party wants to tax the hell out of you and give your money to lazy bums who sit on their ass all day long".

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS (n.)- Abortion. Ex- "Our party strongly supports women's' reproductive rights" trans. "Our party strongly supports the abortion of human fetuses".

TOLERANCE (n.)- Acceptance as equal, especially when it comes to deviant sexual behavior and/or beliefs. Ex- "Boston University believes in tolerance of the transgender lifestyle" trans. "Boston University expects every student to accept people who mutilate their genitals as completely normal and equal to themselves". Cf. mod. Eng. 'Tolerance- the act of putting up with somebody or something irritating or otherwise unpleasant'.

TORTURE (v.)- 1. To hold terrorists and/or criminals in conditions inferior to that of a hotel; 2) to throw a koran in the toilet.

TRANSGENDER (n.)- one who has chosen to mutilate their genitals in a fruitless attempt to become something they are not. Syn. mod. Eng. 'Delusional- one who strongly holds a false belief in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom of mental illness'. See also: mod. Eng. 'Eunuch', a man who has had his penis and testicles removed.

The New South Africa!

2007-01-15T23:10:00.001Z

Civilisation and Acheivement

2007-01-15T17:31:00.000Z

For the purpose of describing the evolution of modern man, we have divided the last three stages of the evolution of modern man into

(1) early man, Homo erectus and his Homo predecessors
(2) archaic man, Homo sapiens (Hs), who was not yet fully modern, and
(3) modern man, Homo sapiens sapiens (Hss).

The dates generally given in the literature are that Hs arose about 200,000 years ago and Hss arose about 150,000 ya, though the authors believe the actual dates were much earlier. But even though physically modern man arose about 150,000 ya, he did not create complex civilizations or make notable achievements until about 40,000 ya.

Apparently, becoming physically modern is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition, to becoming a behaviourally modern.

Between about 40,000 and 50,000 ya Hss underwent a dramatic change, not so much in his physical appearance, but in how his brain worked, with the result that there was a cultural “explosion.” Before then, man’s progress was painfully slow; tens of thousands of years passing with little or no improvements in his tools and weapons. But after the cultural explosion, tools and weapons became better designed and were made of better materials. Man began leaving evidence of abstract thought, such as drawings and carvings. He no longer left his dead to rot and be eaten by animals, but he buried them, often with valued possessions.

What happened? No one knows, but perhaps not coincidentally, a newly-discovered allele of the microcephalin gene, which affects brain size and intelligence, arose about 50,000 ya and spread throughout the Eurasian population. This allele, together with another, similar allele of the ASPM gene, that arose much more recently, is still rare among Africans, and may well explain much of the difference between Eurasian and African IQs and capacity for civilized behavior.

The ASPM allele may have produced a more fissured brain, but since we don’t have the brains of archaic man, we cannot know how fissured his brain was except by the marks the brain left on the inside of the skull, and they are not clear. Perhaps it was a change in the organization of the brain, the way it is “wired,” such as an asymmetry between the left and right sides of the brain that enabled areas of the brain to specialize. (Corballis, 1991).

Civilizations

Baker, in his book Race, argues that a society originates a “civilization” if, prior to influence from outsiders, most of its members meet most of these 21 requirements (Baker, 1974, p 507-508), where “Africans” means sub-Saharan Africans:

Indicia of Civilization

Asians

Caucasians

Africans

1. In the ordinary circumstances of life in public places, they cover the external genital organs and the greater part of the trunk with clothes.

2, They keep the body clean and take care to dispose of its waste products.

3. They do not practice severe mutilation or deformation of the body, except for medical reasons.

4. They have knowledge of building in brick or stone, if the necessary materials are available in their territory.

5. Many of them live in towns or cities, which are linked by roads.

6. They cultivate food-plants.

7. They domesticate animals and use some of the larger ones for transport (or have in the past so used them), if suitable species are available.

8. They have a knowledge of the use of metals, if these are available.

9. They use wheels.

10. They exchange property by the use of money.

11. They order their society by a system of laws, which are enforced in such a way that they ordinarily go about their various concerns in times of peace without danger of attack or arbitrary arrest.

12. They permit accused persons to defend themselves and to bring witnesses for their defence.

13. They do not use torture to extract information or for punishment.

14. They do not practice cannibalism.

15. Their religious systems include ethical elements and are not purely or grossly superstitious

16. They use a script (not simply a succession of pictures) to communicate ideas.

17. There is some facility in the abstract use of numbers, without consideration of actual objects (or in other words, at least a start has been made in mathematics).

18. A calendar is in use, accurate to within a few days in the year.

19. Arrangements are made for the instruction of the young in intellectual subjects.

20. There is some appreciation of the fine arts.

21. Knowledge and understanding are valued as ends in themselves.

A few comments on these items:

3. While there is a mania of tattooing and body piercing sweeping US youth, this is not considered “severe” mutilation or deformation of the body.

7. Domesticating animals requires not only foregoing the instant gratification of eating them, but also caring for them until they have reproduced. Even then, one must plan still farther ahead by eating only the worst animals, saving the best for reproduction. Such long-term planning is not characteristic of Africans.

13. This should be interpreted as open, publicly-accepted torture against common people, and not during a war.

14. Again, this means openly killing people in order to eat them.

15. On January 9, 2001 a lunar eclipse caused rioting in Nigeria; evil people were blamed. (“Eclipse Triggers Nigeria Riot,” BBC News, Jan. 10, 2001) Children are often banned by their own parents in the belief that they are witches. (“DR Congo’s Unhappy Child ‘Witches’,” BBC News, Jan. 13, 2003).

16. Writing arose independently in at least three places: Mesopotamia, China, and Mesoamerica, and probably also Egypt and India, but did not spread to sub-Saharan Africa.

Baker (1974, pp. 506-529) concluded that Caucasians met all 21 criteria in Sumeria (Iraq), Crete, India, and in Egypt, and the Asians met them all in China. The Africans and Australian aborigines met virtually none of the 21 criteria. The list is, of course, open to much dispute, both as to the elements on it and as to whether or not the three listed races have met the requirements.

Since the civilization that a people have created is a good indication of their intelligence and advancement from archaic man, the grandeur of their civilizations should be consistent with the traits they have, as previously described, especially brain size and complexity, and this is indeed the case.

The most advanced civilizations have been created by whites, with the Asians coming in second. Perhaps the reader believes that the failure of Africans to create civilizations in the past is not due to genes, but to an environment that was not encountered by Caucasians and Asians. It does seem that not only does intelligence increase with distance from the equator, but so does civilization. Southern Asia is tropical and it also has a lower level of both intelligence and civilization. The Incas and Mayans, who created civilizations, lived near the Equator but were not indigenous to that area, having originally come from north-east Asia.

Africa is a huge and diverse continent, with southern Africa having a temperate climate. If there was something unique about the continent itself that prevented the creation of civilizations, then one would expect blacks living elsewhere, such as in Haiti or Detroit, to build civilizations, but instead they have destroyed the civilizations that whites had already built there. And one would expect whites who immigrated to Africa to also fail at building successful civilizations on that continent, but whites who immigrated into Africa built first world countries.

Those countries, now taken over by Africans, are descending into chaos. The country of the world’s first heart transplant, the Union of South Africa, is now the rape and murder capital of the world.

Rhodesia, as it was called when run by whites, was the breadbasket of Africa and exported grain; Zimbabwe, as it was renamed when Africans took over, cannot feed half its own people.

Liberia, founded by repatriated American slaves, is dissolving into chaos and cannibalism, despite the infusion of African Americans who had lived in a white country.

If Africans were even capable of keeping a white-created civilization going, one would expect them to be much better off when Apartheid and the economic boycotts of South Africa ended in 1994 and the reins of this first world country were turned over to them. But the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the average income of all races in South Africa dropped 40% between 1995 and 2000 and the UN 2006 Human Development Report found that over the last 3 decades Africa has had a “virtual reversal” of human development. The deterioration of South Africa since the end of Apartheid refutes egalitarianism. No country ruled by blacks has escaped self-inflicted devastation; it is fair to conclude that they are incapable of achieving or maintaining a modern civilization when left to themselves.

A portion of Stonehenge, built 5000 years ago in England: Notice how well the huge stones fit together. The circular structure was aligned with the midsummer sunrise, the midwinter sunset, and the most southerly rising and northerly setting of the moon, suggesting possession of a knowledge of astronomy for perhaps thousands of years prior to its construction. In 2150 BC, a thirty-five ton ‘Heel Stone’ was erected outside the circle. Eighty bluestones, some weighing as much as four tons, were transported from the Prescelly Mountains in Wales, 240 miles away. In 2075 BC, the bluestones were taken down and enormous Sarsen stones, averaging eighteen feet in height and weighing twenty-five tons, were transported from near another stone ring at Avebury, twenty miles to the north.

Now compare Stonehenge with Great Zimbabwe, the largest ruins in sub-Saharan Africa:

It consists of plain stone block walls without mortar and dates to less than 1000 years ago, long after non-Africans had arrived. While Africans supplied the labour, it is doubtful that they designed it or instigated its construction as it is not representative of any past Zimbabwean culture or architectural tradition, and Africans do not make use of stone construction. It may have been built by Islamic slave traders as a fortress and slave holding area.

Accomplishments

Charles Murray catalogued all of the accomplishments of man according to the number of times they were referred to by others (Murray, 2003). Over 97% of the most important scientists, 74% of the most important artists and authors, and almost 100% of the greatest composers were white, almost all males, and mostly from only four countries, Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy; the remainder were mostly Asian, and none were African.

The red hexagon encloses the “European Core,” where 80% of the European significant figures in human accomplishment grew up. Note that southern and far northern Europe are outside the core and that Germany is at its center.

The Chronology of Science and Discovery (Asimov, 1989) lists about 1500 of the most important scientific discoveries. Virtually all were made by Caucasians and Asians and none by Africans. Similarly, while Asians appear in American Men and Women of Science at six times their proportion of the U S. population, African-American representation is negligible (Weyl, 1989).

Prior to contact with other races, sub-Saharan Africans never invented the wheel and axle (Baker, 1974, pp 372-373), never smelted metals, never domesticated a plant or animal, never constructed buildings other than out of plant products and mud (Baker, 1974, pp 368-371), never developed a written language, and could not count beyond their fingers and toes (Baker, 1974, pp 395-396). Blacks who do make significant contributions, or at least rise to prominence (other than in sports and in the media), are almost always mulatto's with a large percentage of white heritage (e.g., Colin Powell).

Mandated and voluntary affirmative action programs in the West (and even in the Union of South Africa for black Africans, though blacks are overwhelmingly in the majority) and political correctness have exaggerated even the meager achievements of blacks. While at one time qualified blacks were excluded from certain occupations, by law or by unions controlled by whites, today the situation is 180° reversed and unqualified blacks are promoted over more qualified whites. Racial discrimination against whites is mandated by law in many predominately white countries. Other predominately white countries, such as the United States, do not have written laws requiring preferential treatment of non-whites, but do have anti-discrimination laws that employers must interpret as requiring the hiring and promotion of minimum numbers of non-whites (quotas) in order to avoid “bad” publicity, lawsuits, fines, and damages for discriminating.

Political appointments of blacks are made to obtain political support for the appointing politicians. Since the pool of qualified blacks is much smaller than the pool of qualified whites, blacks are either appointed to showcase positions or their decision-making authority is limited. The media is reluctant to criticize prominent blacks, especially for incompetence, and colleges and universities offer large amounts of scholarship aid to blacks. All these factors give blacks a huge advantage, yet they still fail to accomplish much.

No black has ever won a Nobel Prize in any of the arts or sciences. Many of the alleged inventions made by blacks have been greatly inflated in their importance. This is true of the most prominent black inventor, George Washington Carver, yet every schoolchild knows his name, though none know the names of the white men who invented plastics, television, the computer, or the internet, all far more important than some uses for the peanut. When a classical radio station plays a rag, it is almost always a composition by Scott Joplin, a black composer, though rags are not exactly classical music.

Killing off all the large mammals on a entire continent is probably not something to brag about, but it is worth noting that they had disappeared from Asia and Europe by about 10,000 ya and by about 11,000 ya in North America, (FN21) and more recently in Australia, and New Zealand all, coincidentally, about the same time as the arrival of technologically-advanced Eurasians. Thankfully, the large mammals in Africa – e.g., elephants, giraffes, rhinoceroses, hippopotamuses, lions, and gorillas - were not killed off by Africans, at least not yet.

Since Africans have no compunctions about killing these animals, a fair conclusion is that the animals were not previously killed off because Africans had not invented the means to do so.

Conquest is another very un-PC area of accomplishment. Caucasians hold the record for conquering other peoples, much to the dismay and shame of Caucasian egalitarians. Portions of all the continents, arguably excepting Antarctica, have been conquered and seized by Caucasians. Other than Genghis Khan, this is much less true of Asians and conquest by Africans of non-Africans is unknown. There was, of course, Hannibal, but he was Caucasian, he was not from sub-Saharan Africa, and his attempt at conquest failed.

One might think that Caucasians, as the most accomplished race by far, would increase in numbers while the numbers of the less accomplished races declined. After all, doesn’t accomplishment equal better adaptation, which equals more reproductive success? Not necessarily, because exactly the reverse is occurring. The white race, which was 25% of the world’s population in 1900, is now (2005) only about 8 to 10%, and the number of whites continues to decline, while the populations of the other races continue to increase. (FN23) Ironically, it is the accomplishments and sacrifices of whites that have made the vast expansion of the other races possible.

Evolution, however, does not imply that those who are the most accomplished in the arts and sciences will have more reproductive success. “Success” in evolution is not the achievements that Murray describes in Human Accomplishment, but success in staying alive and propagating. Caucasians may be good at making discoveries in maths and science and at creating great works of art, but they aren’t so good at reproducing themselves which, as far as evolutionary success goes, is all that counts.

In other words, success in accomplishments implies that Caucasians have a necessary condition for reproductive success – control of the resources and technology needed to support an expanding population, but lack the most important sufficient condition – the will to increase their numbers. Until the widespread use of effective contraception, their lack of will would have had little effect, but now people can choose whether to have children or do something else with their lives, and so many whites are choosing to do something else that the number of white births is less than the number of white deaths.

(1) Africa was visited by Europeans, Indians, and Arabs thousands of years prior to recorded history. This is known because crops and animals not indigenous to Africa are nevertheless found there. Also, visitors left many remains of their own civilizations, such as stone structures, pottery, and metals. (Baker, 1974).

(2) The failure of Africans to domesticate animals is consistent with their high rate of lactose intolerance. Dr Steinman, Milk Allergy and Lactose Intolerance, (May, 2002) gives the following figures for lactose intolerance for children over 5 years old: "90-95% of black individuals and 20-25% of white individuals throughout the world." However, most Asian populations, especially people from Far East, are also very lactose intolerant (close to 100%). Asians did domesticate herds, but did not use them for milk. A few African tribes, such as the Fulani, have low rates of lactose intolerance (around 20-25 percent), but the Fulani are an Islamic people who likely have an Arabic heritage.

(3) “Between 1844 and 1915 only one Haitian President completed his term of office. Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was blown up, one was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob. Between 1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations increased so rapidly that a United States military occupation was needed to restore order. This lasted from 1915 to 1934. Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a mulatto elite which ended in the resumption of control by the black military in 1946. Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been the rule.” (Putnam, 1967).

(4) Detroit looks like a bombed out city, with so much vegetation reclaiming it that it is now one of the greenest cities in the country. (“The Ruins of Detroit” http://www.white-history.com/hwrdet.htm).

(5) "Is it not horrendous for an adult man to rape a nine-month-old baby?” Nobel Peace Prize winner archbishop Desmond Tutu, referring to the belief among South African blacks that raping a baby cures AIDS. File this under “Ouch!”: “KLEINMOND, South Africa - A South African inventor [a white woman] unveiled a new anti-rape female condom [a vagina liner] on Wednesday that hooks onto an attacker's penis and aims to cut [no pun intended] one of the highest rates of sexual assault in the world.” (Reuters, Aug. 31, 2005).

(6) (“The ugly truth about democratic South Africa,” World Net Daily, Dec. 15, 2006).

(7) See internet blog “Why South Africa Is Crap.” The black-white income gap shrank up to 1994, when Apartheid ended, then grew from 98% more for whites to 118% more. (Leibbrandt, 2005).

(8) For details on waste, corruption, stupidity, and savagery in post-colonial Africa, the reader is referred to Martin Meredith, “The Fate of Africa: From the Hopes of Freedom to the Heart of Despair,” Public Affairs Press, 2005.

(9) (www.YouTube.com, “Founded by Americans, Liberia was once the shining star of Sub-Saharan Africa. Now cannibals rule the streets”).

(10) The same is true of other primitive peoples. The remote Australian aborigine community of Wadeye was racked by sexual abuse, gang wars, crime, and poverty. (“Aboriginal township clean-up urged,” Taipei Times, May 24, 2006, p. 4).

(11) Oxford University engineer Professor Alexander Thom and the astronomer Gerald Hawkins pioneered the new field of archaeoastronomy - the study of the astronomies of ancient civilizations. They showed that 2000 years before Euclid, and at least 3000 years before the sixth century AD sage Arya Bhata discovered pi, the Pythagorean theorem and pi were used at Stonehenge. A 4000 year old temple, the Temple of the Fox, has also been found in Peru that had astronomical features (Benfer, 2006). Another example: a bronze analogue navigational computer dated at 80BC was found off a Greek island. See (Wikipedia, “Antikythera mechanism”; Freeth, 2006).

(12) (Baker, 1974, pp 373-377). However, “[donkeys were] the only important domestic animal known to come from Africa.” (Hecht, 2004). Hecht adds that the domestication was only 5000 to 6000 ya in Egypt, so it was not in sub-Saharan Africa and would have been by Caucasians.

(13) Light-skinned blacks are more intelligent (Lynn, 2006, p 65) and accomplished (Baker, 1974, pp 503-505) than darker blacks.

(14) One may wonder why a population would pass laws that sacrifice the interests of its own members to benefit non-members, which is surely suicidal and maladaptive, but that is a subject for later in this book.

(15) In December, 2005, it was announced that Walmart's general counsel told its top 100 law firms that at least one person of color and one woman must be among the top five relationship attorneys that handle its business. It is very common for large businesses to require the promotion of blacks in order for white management to obtain bonuses or promotions. Also see (Cardwell, 2006).

(16) Bill and Melinda Gates, both of whom are white, have set aside $1,000,000,000.00 ($1 billion) through their foundation for scholarships for “minorities,” and many other well-off white people have created similar scholarship funds with lesser amounts.

(17) See “Black Invention Myths,” and “Lies for Profit: The Myth of Black History” on the internet.

(18) (Mackintoch, 1976). Mr. Mackintoch is an historian with the National Park Service in Washington, D.C. Available on the internet.

(19) Textbook publishers now require their school books to be “diverse” to meet state laws for diversity. For example, McGraw-Hill guidelines for elementary and high school texts specifies that “40% of the people depicted should be white, 30% Hispanic, 20% African-American, 7% Asian and 3% Native American.” (Liberty Magazine, Nov., 2006, p. 7). Also see (Lefkowitz,
1997).

(20) Interestingly, musical ability is associated with intelligence. However, African Americans do poorer than Europeans on tests of pitch, tone, and musical memory, and are about the same only on tests of rhythm. (Lynn, 2006, p 55-57).

(21) For a list, see (Arsuaga, 2001, p. 194; Haywood, 2000, p. 64). Horses were actually native to North America, but they had been hunted to extinction by the Indians 10,000 years before the Spaniards arrived; the Spaniards re-introduced them in the 1500s (Allman, 1994, p. 207).

(22) (Picture from The Sunday Telegraph, Sept. 5, 2004). Now that Africans have white man’s guns, these and smaller animals are disappearing. The bonobo chimp is being killed as bush meat, and so are many other animals that Africans could not have killed without white technology. The chimpanzee and the gorilla did get some revenge – the Africans who fed on
them picked up viruses that cause AIDS. (Van Heuverswyn, 2006). That Eurasians killed off large mammals has been disputed (Guthrie, 2006).

(23) “By 2010, whites will account for only about 9% of the world’s population, compared with 17% in 1997, according to demographer Harold Hodgkinson; whites will then be the world’s smallest minority.” (Rubenstein, 2006).

End...............

For further reading on the remarkable history of the White race, please visit http://www.white-history.com/ (click here)

The White History site contains the magnificent book "March Of The Titans - A History Of The White Race" by the remarkable Arthur Kemp.

Mr Kemp, a Rhodesian-born genius currently residing in South Africa, spent the past 25 years researching & writing this incredible book. The complete book is available online, but a lavishly illustrated printed version is available for sale - a must have for any racially aware scholar. Herewith an extract from the preamble:

"March Of The Titans - A History Of The White Race"

The complete and comprehensive history of the White Race, spanning 350 centuries of tumultuous events. This is their incredible story - of vast visions, empires, achievements, triumphs against staggering odds, reckless blunders, crushing defeats and stupendous struggles. From the time of the emergence of the White racial type, their wanderings to the four corners of the globe, and finally into space itself: This remarkable story of human endeavour is without parallel or comparison, and is a story of awe, inspiration and heroism.

Most importantly of all, revealed in this work is the one true cause of the rise and fall of the world's greatest empires - that all civilizations rise and fall according to their racial homogeneity and nothing else - a nation can survive wars, defeats, natural catastrophes, but not racial dissolution.

From: South Africa Sucks

French blogs

2007-01-14T21:54:00.000Z

I've been doing my research on French right wing blogs(an oxymoron I hear you say!)

Well there are right wingers in France, some shockingly so, it has encouraged me no end to see some frogs with some common sense!

Check the French links to see what I mean!

Cool Blog!

2007-01-14T21:37:00.000Z

In a world exclusive, SA Tourism now offers the very brave & often suicidal visitors to this country a double whammy! Apart from the adrenalin rush of being stabbed & shot on the scenic Table Mountain, hijacked & tortured on any of our meandering country roads, or being raped & sodomised on the Durban beach front, you can now ALSO experience the thrill of being blown up in a Cape Town waterfront restaurant!Yes folks, you’ve heard right - two adventures for the price of one!

South Africa Sucks

God Damn Google!

2007-01-14T01:58:00.000Z

I'm not usually one of those people who have a go at google, because business is business and well, shit happens but they have pissed me off over the past few days!

I foolishly switched over to the new blogger and as a result was locked out for days! Perhaps there was something wrong with the system coz I've managed to get in now, but for the past few days I have gone to sign in, been told 'you have singed up for the new blogger, you must sign in via your google account' so off I go to open my google account, press the blooger button, then it goes straight back to the blogger front page!

Round and round I would go!

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Maybe I was doing something wrong, can't see what though!

Never again!

Interesting post on an interesting blog!

2007-01-05T20:34:00.000Z

This Passing Age & Fairy Tales

This world is not all it seems, and the social reality we live in is all topsy-turvy and wrong. Everything's inverted, upside down. Here, the cynic masquerades as a wise man. A man can be a woman if he wants. It is a fantastic place where truth is ridiculed and folly praised, where good is called evil, and evil good.

It's a place that cannot last, a way of life that cannot sustain itself. The world works a certain way, and when people stop living according to the-way-things-are, they end up committing suicide. God is not mocked. The mighty will be pulled down from their seat, He will exalt the humble and meek.In time, this seemingly all-powerful, overwhelming reality will be exposed for what it is: a mere blip on the timeline of the great historical aeons.

For a moment John Lennon thought the Beatles were more influential than Jesus Christ, but there will come a time when no one will remember his name.

We are not condemned to live within the limits of this place. "Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may show that good and acceptable and perfect will of God."

"Who is he that overcomes the world, but he that believes Jesus is the Christ?"All the fairy tales are true. They are the stories that will be remembered long after the stories of this forlorn day are discarded on the dust heap of history.

There is the chivalrous lesson of 'Jack the Giant Killer'; that giants should be killed because they are gigantic. It is a manly mutiny against pride as such... There is the lesson of 'Cinderella,' which is the same as the Magnificat-exaltavit humiles.

There is the great lesson of 'Beauty and the Beast'; that a thing must be loved before it is loveable. There is the terrible allegory of the 'Sleeping Beauty,' which tells how the human creature was blessed with all birthday gifts, yet cursed with death; and how death also may perhaps be softened to a sleep...In the fairy tale an incomprehensible happiness rests upon an incomprehensible condition. A box is opened, and all evils fly out. A word is forgotten, and cities perish. A lamp is lit, and love flies away. A flower is plucked, and human lives are forfeited. An apple is eaten, and the hope of God is gone.

--G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy

The merit of a King

2007-01-04T16:14:00.000Z

"Anyone who has walked through the deserted Palaces of Versailles or Vienna realise how much a part of the life of a nation is lost when a monarchy is abolished. If Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle were transformed into museums, if one politician competed against another for the position of President of the Republic, Britain would be a sadder and less interesting place. Our politicians are not men such as could challenge more than a thousand years of history!"

William Rees-Mogg, former Editor of The Times.

"A priest who is not a monarchist is not worthy to stand at the altar table. The priest who is a republican is always a man of poor faith. God himself anoints the monarch to be head of the kingdom, while the president is elected by the pride of the people.

The king stays in power by implementing God’s commandments, while the president does so by pleasing those who rule. The king brings his faithful subjects to God, while the president takes them away from God."

Neomartyr Vladimir, Metropolitan of Kiev, tortured and killed by Bolsheviks on 7th February 1918.

"Monarchy can easily be debunked, but watch the faces, mark well the debunkers. These are the men whose taproot in Eden has been cut: whom no rumour of the polyphony, the dance, can reach - men to whom pebbles laid in a row are more beautiful than an arch. Yet even if they desire mere equality they cannot reach it. Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes or film stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."

C S Lewis.

"This war would never have come unless, under a modernising pressure, we had driven the Habsburgs out of Austria and the Hohenzollerns out of Germany. By making these vacuums we gave the opening for the Hitlerite monster to crawl out of its sewer on to the vacant thrones. No doubt these views are very unfashionable...."

Winston Churchill, 8th April 1945.

"Those who imagine that a politician would make a better figurehead than a hereditary monarch might perhaps make the acquaintance of more politicians."

Baroness Thatcher, November 1995.

Happy New Year!

2007-01-04T13:26:00.000Z

Well, it did'nt take long for the lefties to come crawling out of their holes and from under their rocks in relation to the well deserved hanging of Saddam Hussein, "UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour said she had appealed directly to Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, saying her concerns about the fairness of Saddam Hussein's trial also applied to his co-defendants. Under international law the men should have the chance to seek a pardon or have their sentences commuted, she said."

A Pardon? Is she serious? Fucking idiot!

In the immediate aftermath, we had a string of European foreign ministers trot out the same shite, perhaps they had decided to bang on about the same thing, I don't know, perhaps they are all as brainless as each other, but they all condemned capital punishment! All of them, For some, this became some sort of opportunity to 'express one's deep held antipathy to capital punishment' and the whole end of Saddam thing got a bit lost! What are these peoples problem?
Can't they grow up for 5 fucking minutes, and stop being the intellectual adolescents that they are?

The (official) European response:

"The EU opposes capital punishment in all cases and under all circumstances and it should not be carried out in this case either."

No, 'well dones' or good ridances' or 'thank God he's dead' etc, just a long, self righteous, monotonous whine!

Tiss interesting a majority of Germans French and Spanish supported Saddam's execution, 55% of Germans and upto 69% of Brits thought he deserved it, also most Europeans in polls taken would like the death sentence to be restored in their countries, it is our self righteous and preening elite who have taken upon it themselves to prevent its return by making it's continued abolision a requirement of membership of the EU.

Bastards! Perhaps they know it is they, who would be first for the chop?

Merry Christmas!

2006-12-23T07:39:00.000Z

Well, I'm working over crimbo, so will be unable to post for a while, but I do hope everyone has a very merry Christmas and a happy new year!

Will you?

2006-12-18T01:50:00.000Z

Will: to wish; desire or like, as in Go where you will. Ask, if you will.

Do you have the will to resist Islam?

Do you have the desire to resist?

Do you have the wish to resist?

Really?

Well you are in the minority, it seems that most of the West has already given up, whether through elections as in Spain or the US, to the cultural surrender we see every day on the net or in our papers or if you are truly lucky like myself, you will see it in your daily life on the street or at work or when watching a film!

Perhaps when a culture or civilisation loses that will, it deserves to whither and die, to be supplanted by a more vigorous civilisation. Rome was a civilised place, but one that had lost its will to survive, it was replaced by the more vigorous and healthy Germanic tribes, who in hindsight deserved the remnants of the once great Roman Empire.

I do know that we would be plunged into a dark age, made darker by that malignant religion of Satan, but perhaps in the far future, light would once again shine?

I also know that this 'fall of the West' will be slow, only recognised as such in centuries to come as 'the fall', it saddens me to come to this conclusion, but there can now be no other way, and NO, America is not immune, it is for better or worse part of the West, prone, perhaps sometimes more prone to the weaknesses of the West, the light may finally be extinguished in North America, but extinguished they will be, why? We lack the will!

On 9/11 I thought that Islam had overstretched itself, I beleived the West would now wake up to reality and confidently bestride the world once again, I honestly believed Islam would be weakened and the West invigorated!

I was so wrong!

Islam is now more powerful then ever, 9/11 was a strategic triumph for Osama Bin Laden and Islam, it terrified most of Europe into silence and anti-Americanism, in a bid to deflect that terror from them.

America did briefly unite, but only for a few months, Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded, dictators toppled, tactically 9/11 was a defeat for Islam, but look at the strength of Islam now!

Iran filled with confidence brazenly develops a nuke in the full view of the wider world, Hizbollah a terrorist orginisation, is on the brink of complete power in Lebanon, Syria is an Iranian puppet! Pakistan is only one general away from becoming an Islamic state, Somalia is already becoming an Islamic state, praised by Bin Laden, Islam is creeping its way back into public life in Turkey, Indonesia is becoming more Islamic by the month, with the severed heads of Christians being proudly displayed in public! the Caucasus are already in the grip of Islam, the former central Asian Soviet states are slipping to the Islamists, as is Bangladesh. Shariah is law in half of Nigeria, de facto law in parts of France and Britain.

Israel will fall, even Israel no longer has the will to fight, we saw this summer how EVEN Israel, our frontline against this threat is weak! It has lost it's will to fight, not helped by the univeral hatred directed at it by the rest of the world.

The West has lost it's faith in God, it's belief in itself, and it's hope for the future. We no longer breed, we take solice in the futile pleasures of promiscuous sex, drugs and inane celebrity gossip. We care no more for the great things in life, we disdain that which is noble, that which is holy and that which is pure.

Perhaps we deserve conquest?

Perhaps this is just the natural order of things, the way things have always been and will always be?

Maybe now is the time to learn Arabic and Mandarin, to ready ourselves for the future, for the furure realities that will face us!

For we no longer have the will to order this world, and if we don't have that will, the Islamic world and China have it in abundance.

The crossroads of civilisation

2006-12-17T18:59:00.000Z

I recently spent some time traveling around the straits of Gibraltar, taking in Gibraltar itself, Spain and most interestingly Morocco, I spent a few days in the Islamic Kingdom and an interesting few days it was as well! I actually enjoyed myself, some people seemed quite nice, the food was great, the markets or Bazaars were very cool and the coffee was excellent (unfortunately no beer!)

(Above, a public square, note, the white arch is the way into the Bazaar)

The most striking thing about the two sides of the straits it how very different they are culturally, on the European side there is a culture of honesty and decency (not implying that every European is honest or decent, I am talking about a trend!) and the Moroccan side where there is a culture of dishonesty and deceit (again I'm not saying every Moor is dishonest or dishonourable, I am talking about the general culture)

I was very probably ripped off in every financial transaction I was involved in, however due to the tiny amounts involved (from my perspective) it matters little to me. However one can't walk five feet without someone else wanting some of your money, they accost you trying to get you to stay in another hotel, you say no, they don't stop, you walk away and they follow you! Then after a few minutes of saying NO, they give up and go off to find some other dim westerner to con, then another guy comes up to you wanting to sell you some substandard tourist tat, and it takes you another five minutes to get rid of him, then someone else tries to sell you hash, and another tries to get you to come into his restaurant, then another begs, and another asks if you want a taxi, etc, etc...

(The local Mosque, the one where that creepy 'call to prayer' eminated from)

There is also a noticeable absence of women in the streets, a few old ones shopping, but no young ones that I can recall, having said that there were also no burqas to see, some hijabs and veils, but no Afghan style burqas, some women even had their hair on show!! (most of them were however Spanish tourists!)

The call to prayer in the morning scarred the shit out of me, it sounded more like an air raid siren then a call to prayer, it was a menacing sound, I decided to remain in bed till the whole call was well and truly over!!

Interestingly, later on the next day, I was in a internet cafe (I thought it wise not to post in Morocco, I didn't even look at any blogs, just in case) when another call to prayer rang out, I wondered whether the cafe would be closed, but no, everyone continued to look at their porn (Everyone except me was pawing through internet porn!)

So, obviously not everyone in Morocco was into the whole prayer thing, they preferred to watch porn!!!

Also, something that stunned me was the way that Moroccan men would come up to me and ask to have sex with me! I have lived in London for years and have regularly passed through Soho or gone to socialise there, and no one, ever has propositioned me, but in Morocco, an Islamic Kingdom, where Al Qaida is organising, I am approached in the street and asked to have sex by complete strangers! How weird is that!!

On the day I left Morocco, I reaad that 11 'suspected Moroccan terrorists' including 1 former Guantanamo Bay detainee were arrested in Ceuta (not 20 miles from where I was) a Spanish enclave on the Moroccan coast after crossing the border!

(Above: Gibraltar; very cool place)

In some ways I think Morocco is about as religious as western Europe, in some ways not, it is a culture with a split personality, and one I intend to investigate further!

Is the fight lost already?

2006-12-04T17:41:00.000Z

There is an intersting new post over at Galliawatch, it is quite disturbing!

"I must admit I was shocked when I received the e-mail from Via-Resistancia announcing that they were dissolving their group.

For those of you who may not know what it was, Via-Resistancia was a Google group consisting of anonymous individuals who were attempting through their steady stream of e-mails to inform the French-language public about the situation in France.

From the start they were pessimistic, but I didn't expect them to end their resistance movement. I have never known exactly who they were, but the group's founder, José Melchor Gonzalez, saw his original website shut down by the French government.

Early on he took a stand against neo-conservatism and perceived the fatal errors Bush was making in Iraq.

He reported constantly on signs of dhimmitude in France and elsewhere and sent out more links than anyone could ever browse through let alone read. In a long e-mail, which I am condensing, he states the reasons for their decision: We consider henceforth that the war against Islam is lost and that it is now up to each of us to provide for his own survival."

This scares the shit out of me, I must admit, I too feel at times that is is like banging one´s head against a brick wall, but is it truly lost? Sometimes despair takes hold, but at other times I´m hopeful, is my hope misplaced?

"Some will leave to go "elsewhere" (assuming there is some place that has escaped the world-wide Muslim metastasis that even allowed a Muslim of the American Democratic Party to be elected to Congress.) Others will try perhaps to "resist" here, assuming one can still hope for a resistance."

I may mock the French, but I really do not want to see it replaced by an Islamic emirate!

"Our perception is as clear as it is pessimistic. The recent signing of an accord on "diversity", a hypocritical word that hides the reality of Islamization on all levels of our society, between the unions and management, with the blessing of the political elite, is the sad reflection of the Muslim century that is opening.

It reflects the surrender of principle by everyone in the elevation of a new world caliphate that will reign in less than 30 years over a large part of the world where it will impose its views, its threats, and its fears, and subject it to a passive dhimmitude (that has already been) agreed upon.

Some of those who claim to be "resisting" call themselves free-enterprise advocates, but big capital, as much as the Left, is already dancing with the Devil in response to the call of the night that is upon the Western world. A night that will soon crucify a Christianity that has become too cowardly to put up any form of resistance."

Well, in this he speaks truth!

"Perhaps at least the last Christians will be able to save their soul and ask forgiveness for having abandoned their lands to Islam."

Perhaps.

"At this point he cites the spread of hallal, the voluntary ban on Christmas trees and all things that remind us of the true nature of the Christmas holiday; he reminds us that when the first veils appeared in the French schools in 1989 it was a Pandora's box that is now wide open; and he bemoans the absence of a leader of stature such as Churchill or Roosevelt: Instead, George Walker Bush consecrated Islam as a "religion of peace and love" and placed a copy of the Koran in the White House library next to the Bible...We can measure the debacle in Iraq by the chaos that reigns there, a probable future Siamese twin of Iran, soon to be in possession of the atomic bomb...As for Tony Blair, isolated, trying to accuse Islam but without sufficient room to maneuver because he, too, still believes that a pacified Islam can coexist with the West."

Well, this is also sadly true, our leaders already appease Islam, they talk of wanting to live in peace with Muslims, something no Islamic society can do, their religion is build on violence, hate and lies.

"But the cartoons and the remarks made by Ratzinger that were definitively censured by Benedict XVI, show how much fear is reigning, and how it permits Islam to impose its totalitarian vision on the world. Politicians, movie makers, simple philosophy teachers, can at any moment be killed for criticizing Islam. Countries like France, Italy, Germany or the Netherlands are even ready to totally renounce their model of society, a model that was erected centuries ago, in favor of the Muslim imperialism that is imposing itself from deep within their borders: hospitals reserved for Muslims in the large Dutch cities, Muslim beaches in Italy, classes on Islam in German schools, renunciation of the 1905 law on "laïcité"(secularism) in France so that, all over the country, mosques can be built whose minarets will be taller than the church steeples...You have to be realistic. For years we've rehashed the same things, we've denounced, we've sent warnings, but nothing changes...And it's not just in Europe, it's everywhere, even in South Korea where a giant mosque for 1500 Muslims has been built. In Cincinnati and in Panama there are now more Muslims than Christians(not sure if this is true). South America is becoming a new land for massive Muslim immigration(Again, no figures to back this up); even in the Antilles they are almost 5% of the population and more than 10% in Quebec!(no references here either) The metastasis is generalized...what can you do about it?Nothing, since nobody in the West has the will to oppose it."

This last comment is what I´ve been banging on about for so long, I hear people moan about immigrants and foreigners, yet, that anger lasts only as long as it takes the next episode of Eastenders or Big Bruva to appear on our screens, the people are fickle, lazy and ignorant, unwilling to concentrate on one thing at a time.

"Even the great Le Pen now boasts regularly of having been the first to have a Muslim deputy elected. At any rate, Le Pen is more anti-Semitic than anything else, hence his coziness with Dieudonné...Islam, untouchable, uncriticizable, will impose itself without any real resistance, except maybe for a few good souls on the fringes who will wear themselves out trying."

Sound familiar?

"You have to be realistic, even in the land of the dead, we know enough to stop a fight when the war is lost. We have children, families, and friends to care for while there is still some time, before the shadow completely covers the world. The twilight is underway and we do not all have the spirit of a Jean Moulin (French WWII resitance fighter who was killed in action)"

"He closes with these words:The 21st century will probably be religious, yes, but Muslim pure and simple. Maybe in a few centuries, in America or somewhere, a new world will be born that will defeat Islam as in the Middle Ages...but until then, Europe...inch Allah."

It seems too familiar, I always hope people will wake up, first after 9/11, but people went back to sleep, then they opposed the Iraq invasion, then the Spanish abandoned the ´War on Terror´after the Madrid attacks, then one hopes the London attacks will stifen peoples spines, but no, just more calls for an afirmation of multiculturalism. Then plots begin to unravel in the public eye, but no, this is not blamed on Muslims or Islam, just on those ever present ´extremists´or ´International Terrorísts´.

I actually dont know if people are capable anymore of offering resitance to an enemy, 3000 dead soldiers and the Americans are about ready to give up and retire back to their cozy MTV lives of celebrity and PSP games. What is that? That is despicable, as Mark Steyn writes in his latest article ''The key issue is no longer WMD or even the role of the U.N. The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail.'' Apparently enough Americans dont seem to mind that they will be shown to be a paper tiger, they dont mind if the Axis of Evil goes on about it´s business undisturbed! In fact it would have been better for the Americans not to even get involved in Afghanistan or Iraq in the first place if this is what is going to happen, because our enemies will be stronger now then ever before.

What ally will willingly go to war with the Americans in the future? I would´nt, I would be thinking, well I might agree that this guy is a bastard, or that this or that regime needs to be bombed into the stone age, but do I trust the Americans to go the whole hog? Truthfully no, perhaps they will go 2 or 3 years but, well once a midterm comes up, one can´t know how it will go!

That pisses me off, because the Americans are the only ones who can realistically carry this war to the enemy, if our greatest hope is this moody, or emotionally fragile then God help us all!

As you can see above the French seem fucked, I know from experience that Britain is dying, most of Europe is in trouble, the only solid country in this seems to be Australia, but as I´ve said before, they can´t do this by themselves!

Thats why America´s mood swing is so dangerous, not only for us who face imminent Islamisation, but to Americans as well, Vietnam hurt you big time, you had pretty much won a war against the commies, then you gave up and allowed them to take the South after 50,000 of your bravest dead. Now you risk forsaking forever the respect due a great power if you run from Iraq (No matter how you say it the world will call it just that) after only 3000 dead! You lost that many men on one beach on D Day alone, how can you expect the world to trmble when you can´t take this?

Grow up you are supposed to be a Super Power or as the French say a Hyper Power! Act like it, lead us!

This is really sad!

2006-12-02T21:23:00.000Z

I am a Moslem woman. I have no face. I have no identity. At age 9, based on lunar year (a lunar year is ten days shorter) I am considered an adult. Being an adult means that I have to adhere with Islamic laws

I have to pray five times a day, fast one month out of the year and cover myself from head to toe in yards of black fabric. I am eligible to be married and can be punished for any wrong doing. I can be incarcerated and, if needed, executed for my crimes, even political ones.

Islam believes and promotes only one relationship between male and female and that is the relation of lust.

I am not allowed to swim, ski, ride a bike, dance, learn to play musical instruments, practice gymnastics, or any other sport. I am not even permitted to watch men play sports, either in the stadium and/or on television.

My worth is based on the Islamic Laws of Retribution, 24th edition, December 1982, as half of a man. It doesn't matter who I am, how educated I am, and what earning potential I may have in my life. My worth is half of a man, any man.

The clause number 6 regarding the dieh (cash value of the fine) states that the cash fine for murdering a woman intentionally or unintentionally is half as much as for a man.

I cannot get custody of my children. Even if their father dies. In the case of divorce or death I have to surrender my children to their father and/or his family.

I will get arrested, beaten, and sometimes even executed if I wear make-up, nylons, bright colors and specifically the color of red.

According to Khomeini, the Iranian Islamic Imam, "The most suitable time for a girl to get married is the time when the girl can have her first menstrual period in her husband's house rather than her father's".

I have to meet all my husband's desires including the sexual ones. And if I refuse he has the right to deny me food, shelter, and all of life's necessities. I have to say yes every time he wants to have sex.

My husband can have four permanent wives and if he is from Shi'i sect, he can have as many temporary wives as he wants.

Koran says that "Men your wives are your tillage. Go into your tillage anyway you want". This means that a man is allowed to sodomise his wife and she cannot complain.

According to the Islamic Laws, I am supposed to be seen outside of my home three times in my life. When I am born, when I get married and when I die.

In Islam, the age of majority for a girl is 9 years and for a boy is 15 years. This means that a 9 year old girl and a 15 year old boy are considered to have the same level of maturity. Now, if girls reach maturity six years earlier than boys, then why did God place men in charge of women? Was there something wrong with God's Judgment?

In Islam, if a 6 or 7 year old girl is raped by an adult man, she will be the one that gets punished. It is her fault because she provoked it. The parents then will burn or kill her because she has dishonored the family.

"Marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if you fear you will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so it is likelier you will not be partial". The Koran 4:3

"Most Europeans have mistresses. Why should we suppress human instincts? A rooster satisfies several hens, an stallion several mares. A woman is unavailable during certain periods where as a man is always active....", Ayatollah Ghomi, LE MONDE, January 20, 1979.

I have no explanation on why God denied me everything and made men in charge of me, if there is a God. I don't believe there ever was one.

Parvin Darabi

Hog Time

2006-12-01T22:46:00.000Z

This is soooo funny, I love this guy! Perhaps we should all get some pet pigs?

"K.I.A., that's the Katy Islamic Association, plan to build a mosque here.

"It's not an appropriate place to have a mosque or church," said resident Barbara Simpson.
It isn't going over real well.

"As a house of worship, they shouldn't be disturbing the peace and tranquility of 15 homes," said resident John Wetmore.

Neighbors tell us they're concerned about traffic and drainage and a little fear of the unknown. Some of the homeowners even offered to buy the land back for more than a million dollars. The K.I.A. doesn't seem very interested in the offers.

"We're not going anywhere," said Katy Islamic Association member Alvi Muzfar.

So it seems the community at the end of Baker Road has a pretty good fight. But this fight has gone much farther than many between two neighbors. You see in these fights, sometimes neighbors throw mud at one another. In this instance, they're wallowing in it.

Craig Baker owns pigs. He's the guy behind the second big yellow sign on Baker Road. That's the one announcing Friday night pig races.

"What does it matter, I can do whatever I want with my land right," asked landowner Craig Baker.

Sure can. But aren't pigs on the property line racing on a Friday night a little offensive to a Muslim neighbor?

"The meat of a pig is prohibited in the religion of Islam," said Katy Islamic Association member Youssof Allam. "It's looked upon as a dirty creature."

Yeah, there's that and also that Friday night is a Muslim holy day.
"That is definitely a slap in the face," said Allam..

Now before you go thinking Craig Baker is unfair, or full of hate, or somehow racist, hear him out.

Baker has long roots here. His family named the road and when the new neighbors moved in, he tells us, they asked him to move out.

"Basically that I should package up my family and my business and find a place elsewhere," said Baker. "That's ridiculous, they just bought the place one week prior and he's telling me I should think about leaving."

That new owners deny they ever said anything like that, but Baker isn't budging.
Baker admits the pigs are a message he is not leaving.

The 11-acre property is sandwiched between a pricey subdivision and Craig Baker's business.
K.I.A. eventually plans to build a mosque, a gym and a school there. There's no date for the groundbreaking ceremonies, or the first pig race."

Democracy: A red herring

2006-11-29T14:14:00.000Z

By Andrew C. McCarthy, from the National Review

This is a war of will.

Very true, and we don't seem to have that will!

If we lose it, the historians will marvel at how mulishly we resisted understanding the one thing we needed to understand in order to win. The enemy.

Yes, someone who understands!

In Iraq, we've tried to fight the most civilized light footprint war of all time. We made sure everyone knew our beef was only with Saddam Hussein, as if he were a one-man militia no Sunni Baathists supporting him, no Arab terrorists colluding, and no Shiite jihadists hating us just on principle. No, our war was only with the regime. No need to fight the Iraqis. They, after all, were noble. They would flock to democracy if only they had the chance. And, once they hailed us as conquering heroes, their oil wealth would pay for the whole thing just 400 billion American dollars ago.

Well, lets stop kidding ourselves! Either we throw this away, or we fight it properly, but Ibelieveleive, there is no longer any way for us to win this, not because we can't, but because I can't see that we can stomach the fight ahead! Churchill gassed rebellious Iraqis, would you accept that? Could you?

For (Mohammedans), the president's euphonious rhetoric about democratic empowerment is offensive. They believe, sincerely, that authority to rule comes not from the people but from Allah; that there is no separation of religion and politics; that free people do not have authority to legislate contrary to Islamic law; that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims, and men to women; and that violent jihad is a duty whenever Muslims deem themselves under attack no matter how speciously. These people are not morons.

I think this is something we should all accept, these people attacking us are not dumb, not Arab versions of 'hicks' or 'country bumpkins', they are for the most part educated men, men with a strong faith in Allah and Mohammeds commanoffensivefensive as that religion may be, this is whabelievebeleive and many prbelievebeleive quite sincerely!

Democratizing such cultures in anything we would recognize as democracy is the work of generations. It is a cultural phenomenon. It is not accomplished by elections and facile constitution writing especially, constitutions that shun Madisonian democracy for the State Department's preferred establishment of Islam and its adhesive sharia law as the state religion. Elections, in fact, play to the strengths of Islamic terrorists. Jihadists are confident, intimidating, and rigorously disciplined. They are thus certain to thrive in the chaos of nascent democracies. Consequently, it should be unsurprising to anyone with a shred of common sense that terrorist organizations are ascendant in the new governments of Iraq, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories.

This is the truth, Islam and Islamic culture is incompatable with freedom or democracy, the only relatively stable Islamic nations are authoritarian monarchies, Morocco, Jordan, Oman, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. They should not see democracy, for when this happens, Islamists gain traction, this is true in Egypt, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc, etc...

Time to face the truth, Democracy is unpaletable even here in the West, its dead in the water in the Islamic world!

Shariah in Britain!

2006-11-29T11:30:00.000Z

From the Telegraph:

"Islamic sharia law is gaining an increasing foothold in parts of Britain, a report claims.

(T)he BBC Radio 4 programme Law in Action produced evidence yesterday that it was being used by some Muslims as an alternative to English criminal law. Aydarus Yusuf, 29, a youth worker from Somalia, recalled a stabbing case that was decided by an unofficial Somali "court" sitting in Woolwich, south-east London."

What the fuck Somalians are doing in this country I don't know, all they are is trouble!

"Mr Yusuf said a group of Somali youths were arrested on suspicion of stabbing another Somali teenager. The victim's family told the police it would be settled out of court and the suspects were released on bail."

Typical really, the police capitulate once again to an 'efnik community innit' what prats!!

"Although Scotland Yard had no information about that case yesterday, a spokesman said it was common for the police not to proceed with assault cases if the victims decided not to press charges."

Unless the 'victim' is alleging RACISM (gasps of horror, screaming in the distance) then the police spend millions of pounds and hundreds of hours investigating!

"However, the spokesman said cases of domestic violence, including rape, might go to trial regardless of the victim's wishes."

Yeah, like that will happen!

"Mr Yusuf told the programme he felt more bound by the traditional law of his birth than by the laws of his adopted country."

Tell you what Mr Yusuf, if that is how you feel, fuck off back to that shit hole you crawled out of!

"Sharia's great strength was the effectiveness of its penalties, he said."

I have got to give him that, our law sees punishment as torture, so you can rape and murder and at worst get 5 years inside, rob, burgle or thieve and you get off scott free!

"Some lawyers welcomed the advance of what has become known as "legal pluralism"."

Yeah, I bet they do!

Blue Labour

2006-11-27T15:36:00.000Z

This post is so good as to be posted in full:

From Melanie Phillips

Daily Mail, 27 November 2006

The sheer cynicism of it simply leaves you open-mouthed. Last week, the Conservative leader David Cameron committed his party to tackling relative poverty, which he defined as not having the things that better-off people take for granted.

His strategy, by now so familiar, couldn’t have been more brazen —or insulting to his party’s past. Getting rid of the Tories’ image as the ‘nasty party’ meant repositioning it as the party of compassion for the poor. To do so, he and his warm-up man, Greg Clarke, knocked Winston Churchill off his plinth as party hero and installed instead the Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee as the Tories’ new icon.

As the nation variously split its sides, went into shock or simply scratched its head, the Cameroons did high fives over their brilliantly counter-intuitive coup. But in their obsession with image, they have failed to grasp that such opportunism does indeed suggest that they have hearts of stone.

For what Ms Toynbee stands for is not compassionate at all. On the contrary, what she embodies is the politics of hatred. Hatred of the middle class, hatred of men and marriage, hatred of private enterprise and profit, hatred of ordinary people whom she regularly berates as stupid, pig-headed and ungrateful —especially when they dare to hold views which differ from hers.

Of course the hypocrisy, on the part of a person who uses private education and enjoys a holiday home in Italy, is stupendous. But the really shocking thing is that Pollyism hurts most the people it purports to help — those at the bottom of the heap.

Its obsession with comprehensive education has meant that the poor, who rely absolutely on school to escape from disadvantage, have been abandoned to illiteracy and ignorance.

Its sustained attack on married parenthood has abandoned millions of children to fatherlessness and every possible disadvantage in life. The main reason why so many British children are so poor is that they are being brought up by struggling lone parents — whose explosion in numbers, according to the doctrine of Pollygamy, is a triumph of women’s liberation.

It has trapped ever more millions of people into debilitating dependency upon the state, infantilising them by robbing them of responsibility for their own lives and families. Wrapping itself in the sanctimonious mantle of progressive politics, it actually betrays the progressive ideal of social justice. Instead of encouraging the good in people and minimising the bad, it rewards the bad and punishes the good.

Indeed it is deeply reactionary, deriving from the core belief that people are fundamentally contemptible and cannot be trusted with independence, needing the superior wisdom and beneficence of the state to run their lives instead.

All this in the name of the sacred agenda of equality, which is nothing other than the politics of envy and spite. The concept of relative poverty was invented to serve that agenda. By setting the poverty benchmark as a proportion of average wealth, ‘relative poverty’ magics up increasing numbers of people deemed to be poor as the society becomes ever richer.

It is therefore the engine behind a vast and self-perpetuating poverty industry, which is in business to penalise the better-off by robbing them for money with which to control the lives of increasing numbers of people through welfare dependency.

Those who work hard are penalised for doing so; rewards go to those whose own behaviour may have accounted for their disadvantaged circumstances. The results are all around us in households which have not merely been left behind as the caravan of prosperity moves on, but which have become disastrously disengaged altogether from the basic tenets of a civilised society.

These shattered wastelands of squalor, hopelessness, misery and despair are the true legacy of the Polly Toynbee vision.

Yet it is to this social injustice — astoundingly — that the Tories have now committed themselves, with Mr Cameron’s ringing declaration that relative poverty is in his sights.
But no sooner had he said this than he veered off in a contradictory direction. Fighting relative poverty, he said, was about tackling the root causes such as family breakdown, drug and alcohol addiction, unemployment or poor education.

This is simply incoherent. Relative poverty can only tackled by income redistribution because it’s all about the gap between rich and poor. Yes, he is absolutely right that the root causes of disadvantage lie in family breakdown and other non-financial factors.

But these can only be tackled by a totally different approach: one that recognises that the welfare state is not the solution but the problem. This is because permanent poverty arises principally from the impoverishment and demoralisation of the human spirit, and the way to remedy it is thus to help change behaviour and give people control over their own destiny.

Mr Cameron pays lip service to re-introducing personal responsibility. Yet he has set his face against recasting state welfare. He is committed to the same spending on health — thus ensuring that the sick poor, who suffer most from the collapse of NHS standards, will remain trapped.
He has dismissed selection in schools, thus opposing the single most important route for poor children out of disadvantage and rejecting the meritocracy which is the very basis of a socially just society.

He will keep the Sure Start childcare programme and the tax credits system, even though Sure Start has been shown to hurt the poor and tax credits have vastly expanded the net of state dependency. Indeed, he appears to be prepared even to undermine the work ethic and weaken the economy by embracing the European 35-hour working week in his Pollyanna-ish pursuit of ‘general wellbeing’.

He is for state controlled public services but also for using the voluntary sector, which would be effectively nationalised; for tax cuts but also for public spending increases; for stable family life but also for lone parents; for a tough approach to crime but also for hugging hoodies and loving louts.

Such radical incoherence enables him to pose as a compassionate Conservative, while leaving us all in a fog about what he would actually do in office.

It is also part of his strategy to enrage traditionalists and newspapers like this one. The louder such protests, the more the Cameroons rub their hands over their ‘Clause Four’ moment in defeating their ‘dinosaurs’.

But when Tony Blair junked Labour’s Clause Four on state control and redistribution of wealth, he was binning a doctrine which ran totally against the interests of the public. Those who supported it were indeed the dinosaurs of the left, and their defeat was essential to persuade the public that never again would Labour engage in class war and frustrate people’s desire to better themselves.

In fact, Labour has indeed conducted an income redistribution by stealth and a sustained onslaught upon the middle class and its values. Yet instead of attacking this, as millions want them to do, the Tories have decided to embrace such an onslaught themselves.

Now an opinion poll suggests that Mr Cameron’s progress may be stalling. If so, this is undoubtedly because people can see through the spin. They don’t want Blue Labour; and they will never trust politicians speaking out of both sides of their mouths.

Throwing Cameroon stardust in people’s eyes may work for a while. But the British are not likely to buy a Polly in a poke. If they can vote for the organ-grinder, after all, why elect the monkey? It’s enough to make a dinosaur laugh.

Some points to make

2006-11-22T16:42:00.000Z

Robert Spencer over at Jihad Watch has published a list of points in answer to some of his critics, I thought that I would do the same! But unlike Spencer I've decided not to bullshit(Why is it all these learned men, criticise Islam, lay out sensible arguments, then fail to make logical conclusions based on the facts?)

1. Islam is not a race. One does not become a racist by opposing Islam.

2. I actually do wish to drive all Muslims out of the West.

3. I beleive that good Muslims are by definition wicked followers of Satan, some Muslims may be good people, but by definition are bad Muslims. The best Muslims are recovering Muslims!

4. I have said that Muslims want to kill Jews and Christians, but they would get a bigger kick out of enslaving us and taxing us.

5. Islam is inconpatable with mankind, civilisation and basic decency! FACT!

Spain is cool by the way, quite civilised, not to many Moors where I am, although the ones that are here stand out like sewage in a bed of roses!

Off to Iberia

2006-11-18T15:10:00.000Z

Well, Tommorrow I'm off to Spain, then on to Portugal. Will be back in a month or so.

The eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month

2006-11-11T12:00:00.000Z

The War on Terror is over!

2006-11-09T17:38:00.000Z

The bad news: We lost!

The war is over, and it is the Muslims who have won.

We may have overthrown the Taliban and Saddam, but the Taliban are back, in force, attacking our boys, wearing our resolve down(which don't take much)

Saddam may very well swing, but it no longer matters, because we have already lost Iraq. We should have flattened Fallujah when they dragged dismembered westerners throught the street, instead we allowed them weeks in which to prepare to fight us, whilst withdrawing their best.

We allowed our press to humiliate us, to commit treason, to act as propigators of enemy propaganda ie: Abu Ghraib (that was not torture!) and Guantanamo.

We condemned Israel as it fought to protect itself, we hampered their efforts and have left them looking weak and vulnerable.

Spain surrendered to Al Qaida after they were attacked, Italy left for a quiet life, and now it seems Americans have decided 3000 dead soldiers is too much!

If this is the case, then we deserve to lose. The thing about this conflict is that we can't bear death, our enemy actively seeks it out.

Only one side can win this, right now, it is not us!

2006-11-09T17:32:00.000Z

From the Guardian

"One Frenchman, 53-year-old teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew.

``Americans are realizing that you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes,'' he said. ``You can't fool everybody all the time - and I think that's what Bush and his administration are learning today.''

Bush is deeply unpopular in many countries, with particularly intense opposition to the war in Iraq, the U.S. terror holding facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and allegations of Washington-sanctioned interrogation methods that some equate with torture.

Many said they thought the big gains by Democrats signaled the beginning of the end of Bush's tenure.

In Copenhagen, Denmark, Jens Langfeldt, 35, said he didn't know much about the midterm elections but was opposed to Bush, referring to the president as ``that cowboy.''

In Sri Lanka, some said they hoped the rebuke would force Bush to abandon a unilateral approach to global issues.

``The Americans have made it clear that current American policy should change in dealing with the world, from a confrontational approach, to a more consensus-based and bridge-building approach,'' said Jehan Perera, a political analyst. The Democratic win means ``there will be more control and restraint'' over U.S. foreign policy.

Passions were even higher in Pakistan, where Bush is deeply unpopular despite billions in aid and support for President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.

One opposition lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result, but was hoping for more. Bush ``deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence,'' he said.

In Denmark, Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told broadcaster TV2 he hoped the president and the new Congress would find ``common ground on questions about Iraq and Afghanistan.''

``The world needs a vigorous U.S.A.,'' Fogh Rasmussen said.

The prospect of a sudden change in American foreign policy could also be troubling to U.S. allies such as Britain, Japan and Australia, which have thrown their support behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Asked whether the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld signaled a new direction in the war that has claimed the lives of more than 2,800 U.S. troops, Bush said, ``Well, there's certainly going to be new leadership at the Pentagon.''

``The problem for Arabs now is, an American withdrawal (from Iraq) could be a security disaster for the entire region,'' said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst for the Gulf Research Center in Dubai. He said the Middle East could be left to cope with a disintegrating Iraq mired in civil war, with refugees fleeing a failed state that could become an incubator for terrorism."

What happened to America?

2006-11-09T00:05:00.000Z

Well, now that was unexpected!
The Democrats hold both the Senate and the House of Representatives, leaving Canada, Australia and the UK the only remaining nations fully committed to this 'war', and here I was thinking the UK would be the first to fold.
Once Blair leaves office next year, that leaves Australia as the only nation fully committed to Iraq, and Australia and Canada the only ones fuly committed to Afghanistan.
The problem with this situation, is that these nations can't hold the line by themselves, they need the US and it's armed forces, so once America leaves, then Canada and Australia must also leave. If this happens, then what country in their right mind would ever risk going to war with the US ever again?
John Howard the brilliant Australian Prime Minister, who risked going into both Afghanistan and Iraq, and who has won reelection, would be left looking like a fool, and once burned, how many other American Presidents would he support if say, we had to invade Iran or North Korea?
Or Stephen Harper, the promising new Canadian Prime Minister, who has recommitted Canada to Afghanistan, how many other military situations would he concern himself with if he is forced to abandon Afghanistan?
The Democrats lost the Vietnam war, Australia and New Zealand had also been fighting with the Americans, they left in the early seventies when it became obvious that the Democrats had already abandoned Vietnam to the communists.
Being burned once is bad enough, being burned twice may leave the Anglosphere terminally fractured!

Royal Marines having fun in Iraq

2006-10-22T21:44:00.000Z